Anonymous wrote:It seemed like a biggish age discrepancy by main husband and wife. Maybe that dude never ages or puts on weight. Or looked the same as his newlywed White Lotus days….

Jake Lacy is 39 and Sarah Snook is 37. IMO they both look their ages (good for their ages, but they dont' look older or younger).

Jake Lacy has a kind of bro-y vibe that makes him look perpetually irresponsible and dickish to me, and I guess that's a youthful vibe.

Well at least they made the white guys jerks or criminals!

*blue collar

Anonymous wrote:I'm not white and maybe this has something to do with it but the show set in a major city was just so white except for the Latino and African American supporting characters.
MINOR SPOILER -- STOP HERE IF YOU WANT



And the implausible big reveal could have only happened because everyone was so conveniently white.

I dunno. Maybe you always watch shows via that lens.

Mental disorders don’t go by race. Neither does neurodivergency or physical handicaps.

It pretty much had characters for every demographic- blue colored whites w petty crime, Hispanic cop, special needs kid, physically handicapped adult brother, black AA cofounder w the wife, Latino nanny, suburban whites near Northwestern.

Heck, even the white nanny looked typical Chicago Russian or Polish. Have you walked around Chicago? Blonds are everywhere from U of Chicago and north. Different demo than Manhattan.

I'm not white and maybe this has something to do with it but the show set in a major city was just so white except for the Latino and African American supporting characters.
MINOR SPOILER -- STOP HERE IF YOU WANT





And the implausible big reveal could have only happened because everyone was so conveniently white.

I really enjoyed it. Is it unbelievable, sure, but it was still an enjoyable mini series.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I loved it! I actually think it was well plotted out and tied up nicely in the end. Sure, maybe there were less than believable parts but that's not what I watch TV for.

Well said. I also enjoyed and binge watched this week. Now I need something else to watch.

+ 1. Wrapped it up in a week or so.

It seemed like a biggish age discrepancy by main husband and wife. Maybe that dude never ages or puts on weight. Or looked the same as his newlywed White Lotus days….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars Sarah Snook. One ep in, pretty meh on it so far. Anyone else watching?

Am halfway in and truly wondering if it’s all her fault- married a loser, went into work partnership with an addict, nanny was hoodwinked, new bestie is ???, school lets other pick up people pick up someone else’s kid with no formal notice, etc.

How was Peter a loser?

This aged well!

What? How was Peter a loser when they got married?

His lifetime of poor communication and lies.

But he hid that for as long as possible from everyone.

Anonymous wrote:I loved it! I actually think it was well plotted out and tied up nicely in the end. Sure, maybe there were less than believable parts but that's not what I watch TV for.

Well said. I also enjoyed and binge watched this week. Now I need something else to watch.

I enjoyed All His Fault.
It was beautifully done. Little bit of Chicago, Australia and the south side.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars Sarah Snook. One ep in, pretty meh on it so far. Anyone else watching?

Am halfway in and truly wondering if it’s all her fault- married a loser, went into work partnership with an addict, nanny was hoodwinked, new bestie is ???, school lets other pick up people pick up someone else’s kid with no formal notice, etc.

How was Peter a loser?

This aged well!

What? How was Peter a loser when they got married?

Peter with the long term track record of being a delusional psychotic, pathological liar, narcissist and worse?

Thought the last half of episode built up his evil persona very well.

Unclear how he made his money, hedge fund or something? He behaved like a trust fund dunce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars Sarah Snook. One ep in, pretty meh on it so far. Anyone else watching?

Am halfway in and truly wondering if it’s all her fault- married a loser, went into work partnership with an addict, nanny was hoodwinked, new bestie is ???, school lets other pick up people pick up someone else’s kid with no formal notice, etc.

How was Peter a loser?

This aged well!

What? How was Peter a loser when they got married?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stars Sarah Snook. One ep in, pretty meh on it so far. Anyone else watching?

Am halfway in and truly wondering if it’s all her fault- married a loser, went into work partnership with an addict, nanny was hoodwinked, new bestie is ???, school lets other pick up people pick up someone else’s kid with no formal notice, etc.

How was Peter a loser?

This aged well!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This ended up being a dumb show. Peter is on the phone with the police and hangs up when Carrie walks in with a gun? How stupid.

maybe he was smart enough to realize that he wanted to kill her before the police got there?

also, it is unclear to me whether he actually hung up on the police

I was hoping they heard the whole thing go down.