Power surge: law changes could soon bring balcony solar to millions across US
Tweaks to state laws mean many Americans will be able to benefit from small, simple plug-in solar panels
Acquiring solar panels at home can be an expensive hassle for people in the US. But small, simple, plug-in solar panels for use on balconies are soon to become available for millions of Americans, with advocates hoping the technology will quickly go mainstream.
Earlier this year, Utah became the first state in the country to pass legislation allowing people to purchase and install small, portable solar panels that plug into a standard wall socket.
When attached outside to the balcony or patio of a dwelling, such panels can provide enough power for residents to run free of charge, home appliances such as fridges, dishwashers, washing machines and wi-fi without spending money on electricity from the grid.
Balcony solar panels are now widespread in countries such as Germany – where more than 1m homes have them – but have until now been stymied in the US by state regulations. This is set to change, with lawmakers in New York and Pennsylvania filing bills to join Utah in adopting permission for the panels, with Vermont, Maryland and New Hampshire set to follow suit soon
Anonymous wrote:I remember when we first bought our home 29 years ago we couldn't afford the Natural Gas bill. It was 500 a month. We had a gas furnace. We put the thermostat on 60 thru the winter months. Wore coats in the house and had electric blankets. We had a much cheaper bill. We were house poor at the time.
Now we are older and richer and the thermostat is on 72.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:My solution is to keep my (too) big DC house uncomfortably warm in the summer. After that first $525 Pepco bill in July, I set the thermostat at 80 degrees during the day / 78 at night.
I've said this before on these kinds of threads, but, those of us for whom a $500 pepco bill is a problem are not the people who can spend $30k on panels. If I could finance $1200/month for years to pay off the panels, I wouldn't be bitsching about a couple of $500 pepco bills, would I?
DC has free solar options. You won’t get the tax credit or the SRECs, but you will save on your electric bill.
I'm trying to decide between the no-cost (I pay nothing for the install, but the company keeps the SRECs and owns the system) and regular option. I'd love any thoughts as to which is preferable at this point. I have the savings to finance the panels etc..
Anonymous wrote:DC Water has also had horrendously high charges for years, with DC residents bearing the financial responsibility for the utility's overly bloated payroll and massive projects to rid the Anacostia and Potomac rivers of toxic sewage.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who owns a SFH or rowhouse in DC and doesn’t do solar is a moron. In the summer months it’s literally an +$800/month increase in my bank balance relative to paying full freight to Pepco.
Anonymous wrote:It would have to be installed and operational by the end of the year.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:My solution is to keep my (too) big DC house uncomfortably warm in the summer. After that first $525 Pepco bill in July, I set the thermostat at 80 degrees during the day / 78 at night.
I've said this before on these kinds of threads, but, those of us for whom a $500 pepco bill is a problem are not the people who can spend $30k on panels. If I could finance $1200/month for years to pay off the panels, I wouldn't be bitsching about a couple of $500 pepco bills, would I?
DC has free solar options. You won’t get the tax credit or the SRECs, but you will save on your electric bill.
I'm trying to decide between the no-cost (I pay nothing for the install, but the company keeps the SRECs and owns the system) and regular option. I'd love any thoughts as to which is preferable at this point. I have the savings to finance the panels etc..
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:My solution is to keep my (too) big DC house uncomfortably warm in the summer. After that first $525 Pepco bill in July, I set the thermostat at 80 degrees during the day / 78 at night.
I've said this before on these kinds of threads, but, those of us for whom a $500 pepco bill is a problem are not the people who can spend $30k on panels. If I could finance $1200/month for years to pay off the panels, I wouldn't be bitsching about a couple of $500 pepco bills, would I?
DC has free solar options. You won’t get the tax credit or the SRECs, but you will save on your electric bill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beverly Perry, former Pepco executive,
plays special advisor to Mayor Bowser for years and rates are now up by 30% this year; the year she leaves Bowser’s administration.
Perry did her big one and left.
https://51st.news/dc-electricity-bill-high-pepco/
rates are set by the public service commission, not the mayor