Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All children have a right to education. But all children don’t have a right to in person education, if the cannot behave. A fine makes zero sense, but I do think all schools need a virtual option. In person school should be reserved for the kids that want and are able to learn without being disruptive. Schools can assign virtual education if student cannot sit in class without being a distraction and disruption.

So a fine? You're just playing semantics.

A virtual education of, say, a 7 year old would mean that one of the parents can't work and has to be at home to supervise. So you're taking away their ability to provide for that child?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good luck trying to find them. They’re usually the MIA parents.

-a teacher

Sounds like you haven't even tried to get in contact with them.

Anonymous wrote:Good luck trying to find them. They’re usually the MIA parents.

-a teacher

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even when some schools struggle, or when kids face behavior challenges or come from families who aren’t as supportive, it still matters that we all invest. Every child deserves a fair shot, and for many, school is the one place where they can find stability, caring adults, and opportunities to break cycles of hardship. When we give up on those schools or kids, the problems don’t disappear...they grow into bigger social and economic costs down the road, like higher unemployment, crime, and strain on public services. Investing in every school and every student is how we make sure all kids (not just the lucky ones) have a chance to contribute positively to society.

Why should my kid be involved in your social programs though.

Because you live in a large society and not on an island by yourself. You think WAY too highly of yourself and your kids.

Anonymous wrote:So you want even more competition for few desirable college spots, OP? Something tells me you don't.

Anonymous wrote:It frustrates that my kids behave are eager learners, but I have to pay more to get them a decent education, when they are actually easier to teach than those who don't perform as well and are actually actively disrupting my kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public schools are a social safety net, designed for the average and below average. If your kids are eager learners, they have the choice to seek a better environment.

So who are all those kids in public schools whose parents claim they brilliant, in the 99% of every test ever taken? Someone should let them know they in the wrong place.

After reading your sentences, I think you’re definitively in the 1%.

It’s called sarcasm. You focusing on sentences that have missing words only verifies that you have no legitimate argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public schools are a social safety net, designed for the average and below average. If your kids are eager learners, they have the choice to seek a better environment.

So who are all those kids in public schools whose parents claim they brilliant, in the 99% of every test ever taken? Someone should let them know they in the wrong place.

After reading your sentences, I think you’re definitively in the 1%.

Anonymous wrote:The point of public education is to attempt to bring as much of the population as possible up to a minimum standard of academic proficiency, while promoting social cohesion, and to keep juvenile delinquents occupied. Anything else we get out of it is just gravy. It was never designed to help every individual student reach their maximum potential.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It frustrates that my kids behave are eager learners, but I have to pay more to get them a decent education, when they are actually easier to teach than those who don't perform as well and are actually actively disrupting my kids.

I think you're a pretty despicable person for having thoughts like this. I'd like people like you to be fined for being scum.

Anonymous wrote:All children have a right to education. But all children don’t have a right to in person education, if the cannot behave. A fine makes zero sense, but I do think all schools need a virtual option. In person school should be reserved for the kids that want and are able to learn without being disruptive. Schools can assign virtual education if student cannot sit in class without being a distraction and disruption.

Anonymous wrote:It frustrates that my kids behave are eager learners, but I have to pay more to get them a decent education, when they are actually easier to teach than those who don't perform as well and are actually actively disrupting my kids.