Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Trump is not my cup of tea. But it’s honestly hard to take the “threat to Democracy” argument seriously when the Democrat nominee received zero primary votes and instead was elevated by palace insiders. While several states took Trump off the ballot which the Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY was unconstitutional.

+1000

Details, details.

Odd, I thought she was on the ticket Biden/Harris... didn't she get all the primary votes for Biden/Harris?

Nope. That’s not how presidential primaries work in our country. There are no tickets. Remember that Trump did not select Vance until July 2024 he’d won enough delegates. And there were calls for Biden to replace Harris as late as June 2024, which in retrospect he should have done. It’s the Democrats who believe in kings and queens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Trump is not my cup of tea. But it’s honestly hard to take the “threat to Democracy” argument seriously when the Democrat nominee received zero primary votes and instead was elevated by palace insiders. While several states took Trump off the ballot which the Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY was unconstitutional.

+1000

Details, details.

Odd, I thought she was on the ticket Biden/Harris... didn't she get all the primary votes for Biden/Harris?

Anonymous wrote:I was part of a group that marched down 14th Street to Pennsylvania. It was majority white but pretty diverse (incl. many of the organizers). There were kids, young adults, middle aged and older participants - seemed evenly split men/women. Once we got downtown, I saw more young people in the crowds. Such a great event - very positive and inclusive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness we still have President Trump in charge. Kudos to you all who kept the kings away!

Ironical, ain't it? If he was a King, there would be no protests.

'

'You two are just playing dumb, right?

Anonymous wrote:I walked out my front door yesterday morning just off 14th Street and there was a massive crowd marching to the Capitol. I joined in and walked with them.

I hate to disappoint the MAGA poster, but the crowd was extremely diverse both racially and by age. It was not overwhelmingly white or old. It was great to witness and to participate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Trump is not my cup of tea. But it’s honestly hard to take the “threat to Democracy” argument seriously when the Democrat nominee received zero primary votes and instead was elevated by palace insiders. While several states took Trump off the ballot which the Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY was unconstitutional.

+1000

Details, details.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Trump is not my cup of tea. But it’s honestly hard to take the “threat to Democracy” argument seriously when the Democrat nominee received zero primary votes and instead was elevated by palace insiders. While several states took Trump off the ballot which the Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY was unconstitutional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Trump is not my cup of tea. But it’s honestly hard to take the “threat to Democracy” argument seriously when the Democrat nominee received zero primary votes and instead was elevated by palace insiders. While several states took Trump off the ballot which the Supreme Court ruled UNANIMOUSLY was unconstitutional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

You're point is nonsensical and wrong. Thank god anyone (including seniors) is trying to save democracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone there under the age of 70?

Why is that a negative?

Because 65+ crowd is removed from the struggles of working age people entirely. Especially in the affluent bubble. They have their Medicare and SS and subsidies if poor and if well off are sitting on literal piles of money and don't know what to do with it and obviously not worried about their kids who are going to inherit half of it. Nothing better to do than spend a nice day under a vague and vapid sign like "no kings", because they have no clue what real issues to even put on their slogans or what exactly they are protesting.