Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a practical standpoint, if she lives in the UK, how often do you think it is even possible that she will be taking care of your kids.
I wouldn't add anything in for those rare occasions.
+1 I wouldn't get into a tit for tat about mother in laws when yours is on another continent and his is likely to be living in the same house as the child soon. Concentrate on keeping things amicable so that it will naturally make more sense in his mind to call you when he's called out of town, before booking a plane ticket.
I’m OP and you have it mixed up. STBexMIL lives permanently in the Uk. DH would fly her the 6 hours or whatever whenever he had a work trip so she could babysit. And then fly her back to the UK. She is the primary caregiver for another grandchild there.
My mom is local. She does not live with us, and probably won’t for 3-4 years. I don’t anticipate her providing childcare ever but am concerned about my child being a teen one day and wanting to stay home alone and not being able to if she does move in with us.
This will sort itself out. UK Granny will do this 1-2x and you’ll end up with the kids.
Play the long game.
This, he will still get his "appearances and pride" with this.
Oh, look how wonderful he is, he's such a devoted dad, has 50/50 custody even with his packed schedule, and he makes soooo much money, look how he flew grandma from the UK, isn't that nice, what a great guy! (Meanwhile he did it twice out of eight work trips, is getting discounted child support, and the time he does spend with the kid he's probably on his work phone)
OP and yeah, I think you summed it up pretty nicely here. I pray that it will be twice out of eight work trips. The reality is more like 20-30 trips per year and even if she only covered 25% of them that would still be a ton of time. And I won’t be able to renegotiate child support without returning to court, which will be expensive and require a track record of him regularly bailing on visitation for an extended period of time. My state is every 2 years for child support modification barring a “significant” change in circumstances, and that would be totally missed visitation, not bailing out half the time for travel.
He’s kind of got a brilliant plan here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Not PP you replied to, but you need to calm down, OP. That comment was way out of line. Most parents end up having to work around some scheduling issues on their own, outside of the legal custody agreement. If your job is not flexible in this way, then he will have to figure out childcare during his parenting time. And you will not get a say. Honestly, both you and the husband seem really, really rigid and punitive. Your children are going to get the short end of the stick if you two keep that up. They will be your victims. Let's be clear about who you are both hurting here.
That's not how custody works. If you want 50/50, commit to a consistent schedule for the kids and for your spouse's job so they can continue to contribute their share to financially supporting the children. It is not in the best interests of children for them to be expecting to be at mom's house Sun-Fri and then suddenly on Tuesday they find out they're there for just Sun-Weds because dad is leaving on a work trip the next Monday and wants extra time Thursday and Friday to make up for his trip the following week.
The only people I've heard of who do that had extremely amicable divorces, extraordinarily high net worth, and settled everything out of court and cooperatively.
Someone as described in this thread who is so hellbent on maintaining a travel schedule that is clearly not compatible with 50/50 that they're proposing the imaginary solution of flying old women across oceans is probably not a person to whom OP should be offering makeup time and flexible custody arrangements to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Talk to him about it and offer to change parenting days when he travels. If its not ok his mom care for the kids, why is it ok yours care when she's not doing well herself and cannot actually care for the kids. You both need a real and realistic back up plan.
Mine doesn’t even live with us and wouldn’t care for DC. DC is 8. I’m just imagining a future when DC is 13 and my mom has moved in and DC can’t stay home “alone” like a normal 13 year old for a few hours because they would be technically in the house with my mom so DH could trigger ROFR.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So a lot of this is about him looking good and being rich presumably at your expense. If you end up more time he has to pay more because you are incurring the expenses, no? Ask your lawyer.
Yes but first I have to document over time and then go back for modification which can only be done after a 2 year period unless he egregiously skipped out on visitation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a practical standpoint, if she lives in the UK, how often do you think it is even possible that she will be taking care of your kids.
I wouldn't add anything in for those rare occasions.
DH has added it into the parenting plan he presented prior to our formal mediation session, so I think both he and his attorney see this as perfectly practical. He is very well-compensated and drowning in frequent flier miles so she could easily fly business class in perpetuity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Not PP you replied to, but you need to calm down, OP. That comment was way out of line. Most parents end up having to work around some scheduling issues on their own, outside of the legal custody agreement. If your job is not flexible in this way, then he will have to figure out childcare during his parenting time. And you will not get a say. Honestly, both you and the husband seem really, really rigid and punitive. Your children are going to get the short end of the stick if you two keep that up. They will be your victims. Let's be clear about who you are both hurting here.
That's not how custody works. If you want 50/50, commit to a consistent schedule for the kids and for your spouse's job so they can continue to contribute their share to financially supporting the children. It is not in the best interests of children for them to be expecting to be at mom's house Sun-Fri and then suddenly on Tuesday they find out they're there for just Sun-Weds because dad is leaving on a work trip the next Monday and wants extra time Thursday and Friday to make up for his trip the following week.
The only people I've heard of who do that had extremely amicable divorces, extraordinarily high net worth, and settled everything out of court and cooperatively.
Someone as described in this thread who is so hellbent on maintaining a travel schedule that is clearly not compatible with 50/50 that they're proposing the imaginary solution of flying old women across oceans is probably not a person to whom OP should be offering makeup time and flexible custody arrangements to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was in a similar situation. You have to let it go. It won’t last long.
Any survival tips?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Not PP you replied to, but you need to calm down, OP. That comment was way out of line. Most parents end up having to work around some scheduling issues on their own, outside of the legal custody agreement. If your job is not flexible in this way, then he will have to figure out childcare during his parenting time. And you will not get a say. Honestly, both you and the husband seem really, really rigid and punitive. Your children are going to get the short end of the stick if you two keep that up. They will be your victims. Let's be clear about who you are both hurting here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
No way am I going to contort myself to fit his travel schedule after divorce as if we’re still married and then sacrifice the career I need to survive just to appease his need to look like a good dad while he is unwilling to sacrifice a single thing to see his kids. There are a million jobs that pay quite well for someone like him that don’t require travel every week or every other week. He just can’t put his ego and need for external validation above his responsibility to his kids.
Go back to your incel forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Sounds like it’s your pride and appearance and you are taking the kids from dad. The simple solution is to be flexible and switch days and weeks as needed. Kids deserve both parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is 50/50 so he does not have to pay child support?
He’ll have a small fortune. He filed several weeks before a significant, life-changing petition. I don’t think it’s about child support so much as appearances and pride.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a practical standpoint, if she lives in the UK, how often do you think it is even possible that she will be taking care of your kids.
I wouldn't add anything in for those rare occasions.
+1 I wouldn't get into a tit for tat about mother in laws when yours is on another continent and his is likely to be living in the same house as the child soon. Concentrate on keeping things amicable so that it will naturally make more sense in his mind to call you when he's called out of town, before booking a plane ticket.
I’m OP and you have it mixed up. STBexMIL lives permanently in the Uk. DH would fly her the 6 hours or whatever whenever he had a work trip so she could babysit. And then fly her back to the UK. She is the primary caregiver for another grandchild there.
My mom is local. She does not live with us, and probably won’t for 3-4 years. I don’t anticipate her providing childcare ever but am concerned about my child being a teen one day and wanting to stay home alone and not being able to if she does move in with us.
That's literally what I said. Don't get into a tit for tat about mothers in law because your MIL lives on another continent and his MIL is likely to be living in the same house as the kid.
And knowing that your MIL is already the primary caregiver for a grandchild in the UK makes it even less likely that she would actually be flown over for last minute babysitting. Realize how unlikely this is to materialize as a real issue, let alone a recurring one, and move on.
I think it will be an issue. His side of the family has gotten very involved in the divorce proceedings and supporting him in getting 50/50 custody (“or more!”, as one relative said). I think there is a lot of pride and egos and other stuff involved. Like they have to prove that their son is a good guy so they’re waving their hands around to distract from the whole walking out on us thing.
I do thing they would move mountains to bring family back and forth to make sure 50/50 worked just so they could tell extended family and neighbors what a good dad STBX is.
They might. That’s OK. You should accept that his family being involved in your child’s life may be a good thing. It might also fizzle after 6-12 months when they realize just how impractical it is.