Anonymous wrote:I’m a lawyer and stayed home for 7 years then went back to work. I’m probably not quite as senior as I would be if I had worked those years but no regrets whatsoever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#1 - this is an insufferable question. There is NO one right answer.
But also, #2
For our family, it always worked better to have a parent who didn't work. And we've done it all - one working one not, both part time, one part time, both full time.
Kids need flexibility and responsiveness. Which you never really have if you are working. Especially if you are working either a high level
Job or a low level job, both have very little autonomy.
Kids get sick, they need emotional support and guidance, they need food/rides/appointments, all things that require your physical and emotional presence. You can't hire everything out. We tried.
Parents have a bandwidth too. You can't give 100% to your job AND your family. So you end up splitting your energy in a way when no one ever really gets what they need. Especially YOU.
You can't schedule quality time. You can't control when the crisis is going to happen. You can't control when the good stuff happens either.
And this is true at EVERY AGE. (My kids are now in college)
You just have to be there.
This is a great answer. I am the PP who worked, SAHM and am back working. I will say, the higher up I climb in my career, the less time I have for my family. It is hard when I feel a great sense of accomplishment at work, knowing the cost to my family. I do not believe I can have it all - at least not all once. Thankfully my family is supportive and my boss is family friendly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You also need to evaluate what kind of parent you are. One who enjoys extended hours with them or can't handle it. If you enjoy being with them, its worth it for them and for you. If you are unhappy and miss creative and social aspects of work too much to value this time then its of no value to anyone.
You should have evaluated this before you had kids.
-1 it is a constant, evolving calculation, OP. You're asking the right questions. From reading over the responses, it seems that part-time and/or lots of flexibility (freelance work, telework, generous leave, understanding boss) would be the answer.
Thanks also for asking this question. I'm at a different stage of parenting but find it helpful to re evaluate my choices and options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:#1 - this is an insufferable question. There is NO one right answer.
But also, #2
For our family, it always worked better to have a parent who didn't work. And we've done it all - one working one not, both part time, one part time, both full time.
Kids need flexibility and responsiveness. Which you never really have if you are working. Especially if you are working either a high level
Job or a low level job, both have very little autonomy.
Kids get sick, they need emotional support and guidance, they need food/rides/appointments, all things that require your physical and emotional presence. You can't hire everything out. We tried.
Parents have a bandwidth too. You can't give 100% to your job AND your family. So you end up splitting your energy in a way when no one ever really gets what they need. Especially YOU.
You can't schedule quality time. You can't control when the crisis is going to happen. You can't control when the good stuff happens either.
And this is true at EVERY AGE. (My kids are now in college)
You just have to be there.
This is a great answer. I am the PP who worked, SAHM and am back working. I will say, the higher up I climb in my career, the less time I have for my family. It is hard when I feel a great sense of accomplishment at work, knowing the cost to my family. I do not believe I can have it all - at least not all once. Thankfully my family is supportive and my boss is family friendly.
Anonymous wrote:#1 - this is an insufferable question. There is NO one right answer.
But also, #2
For our family, it always worked better to have a parent who didn't work. And we've done it all - one working one not, both part time, one part time, both full time.
Kids need flexibility and responsiveness. Which you never really have if you are working. Especially if you are working either a high level
Job or a low level job, both have very little autonomy.
Kids get sick, they need emotional support and guidance, they need food/rides/appointments, all things that require your physical and emotional presence. You can't hire everything out. We tried.
Parents have a bandwidth too. You can't give 100% to your job AND your family. So you end up splitting your energy in a way when no one ever really gets what they need. Especially YOU.
You can't schedule quality time. You can't control when the crisis is going to happen. You can't control when the good stuff happens either.
And this is true at EVERY AGE. (My kids are now in college)
You just have to be there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have three young kids. My career is at an inflection point and I’m considering taking a pause to be fully present with my kids.
If your kids are out of the little kid phase - looking back, do you think it matters to have a stay at home mom? Do you regret working full time or staying home full time? Or are you happy that you continued your career or stayed home? I would love to hear how parents whose kids are older reflect on working vs staying home.
Work, in some form, will always be there. Your kids will not.
It’s really that simple, OP.
Anonymous wrote:#1 - this is an insufferable question. There is NO one right answer.
But also, #2
For our family, it always worked better to have a parent who didn't work. And we've done it all - one working one not, both part time, one part time, both full time.
Kids need flexibility and responsiveness. Which you never really have if you are working. Especially if you are working either a high level
Job or a low level job, both have very little autonomy.
Kids get sick, they need emotional support and guidance, they need food/rides/appointments, all things that require your physical and emotional presence. You can't hire everything out. We tried.
Parents have a bandwidth too. You can't give 100% to your job AND your family. So you end up splitting your energy in a way when no one ever really gets what they need. Especially YOU.
You can't schedule quality time. You can't control when the crisis is going to happen. You can't control when the good stuff happens either.
And this is true at EVERY AGE. (My kids are now in college)
You just have to be there.
Anonymous wrote:Unless you are homeschooling, you aren't staying home with your kids. You are staying home to have 6-7 hours a day of me time. Own it for what it is. Your kids are at school for 6-7 hours a day, you could be working - you aren't with them or being present with them at all during that time, they aren't even there.
I have a babywho is a few months old and a teen. Please read more carefully before you post in such an abrasive manner.
Further, I learned when my teen was school aged, and I was working full time, that there is a benefit to being present at home. Yes, you can be very present while your children are at school. It gives you an opportunity to prepare, organize, and coordinate. There are many wonderful things that can be done during school hours that enhance family life. Wishing you peace.
Anonymous wrote:I have three young kids. My career is at an inflection point and I’m considering taking a pause to be fully present with my kids.
If your kids are out of the little kid phase - looking back, do you think it matters to have a stay at home mom? Do you regret working full time or staying home full time? Or are you happy that you continued your career or stayed home? I would love to hear how parents whose kids are older reflect on working vs staying home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You also need to evaluate what kind of parent you are. One who enjoys extended hours with them or can't handle it. If you enjoy being with them, its worth it for them and for you. If you are unhappy and miss creative and social aspects of work too much to value this time then its of no value to anyone.
You should have evaluated this before you had kids.
Anonymous wrote:You also need to evaluate what kind of parent you are. One who enjoys extended hours with them or can't handle it. If you enjoy being with them, its worth it for them and for you. If you are unhappy and miss creative and social aspects of work too much to value this time then its of no value to anyone.
Anonymous wrote:I have three young kids. My career is at an inflection point and I’m considering taking a pause to be fully present with my kids.
If your kids are out of the little kid phase - looking back, do you think it matters to have a stay at home mom? Do you regret working full time or staying home full time? Or are you happy that you continued your career or stayed home? I would love to hear how parents whose kids are older reflect on working vs staying home.