Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Literally no one (besides your coworkers, OP) is talking about this.
That's...not true at all. Lots of people are watching things develop and questioning when it's time to get out of dodge. My household certainly has a "get out" plan in place, we're just watching for specific triggers.
Genuinely curious what your get out triggers are
Many of them have already been tripped (military in our cities, the attempts to criminalize dissent, etc.). The big one I have my eyes on is the prosecution of political enemies, which he is certainly attempting, but the court system itself seems to be holding for the time being. Now if he were to bypass the court system altogether and start locking up/executing/disappearing political enemies, journalists, and activists who are citizens, that'd be a big one. I'm also keeping an eye out for any asset seizure, revoking citizenship, etc. I'm also watching the rich people. If/when they begin to jump ship, I probably will too.
The issue with this regime is that they're attempting all the classic moves of fascism, but they are stupid and incompetent, so they haven't been entirely successful. The question is no longer "Is this a fascist takeover?" but rather, "Will this fascist takeover succeed?" I'm not yet sure enough that it will to uproot my life, and I'm not yet in immediate danger. But I have a plan and a go-bag should that change.
What History Teaches
• Fascist takeovers often look sloppy or absurd until they’re suddenly entrenched. Many contemporaries underestimated the threat because they thought, “These guys are clowns, they’ll never succeed.”
• Large portions of the population weren’t necessarily ideologically fascist — but they tolerated authoritarianism out of fear, apathy, or because they liked the scapegoating.
• By the time everyone “knew for sure” it was authoritarian, it was too dangerous to resist openly.
Yep, definitely understand the risk of underestimating them. I've really been coming to terms recently with the reality that most (white) people are ultimately going to side with these guys if it gets to that point. It's a hard truth to accept.
Yes. Self preservation, even if they don't agree with it.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a country on earth like that except North Korea. It’s extremely unlikely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a country on earth like that except North Korea. It’s extremely unlikely.
And Cuba.
Anonymous wrote:The ignorance in this thread is astounding, truly astounding. It is especially so compared to historical political movements.
There is zero chance of an exit ban under this administration, and frankly, why would they institute one? These people would love if the people supposedly talking about this to leave.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Literally no one (besides your coworkers, OP) is talking about this.
That's...not true at all. Lots of people are watching things develop and questioning when it's time to get out of dodge. My household certainly has a "get out" plan in place, we're just watching for specific triggers.
Genuinely curious what your get out triggers are
Many of them have already been tripped (military in our cities, the attempts to criminalize dissent, etc.). The big one I have my eyes on is the prosecution of political enemies, which he is certainly attempting, but the court system itself seems to be holding for the time being. Now if he were to bypass the court system altogether and start locking up/executing/disappearing political enemies, journalists, and activists who are citizens, that'd be a big one. I'm also keeping an eye out for any asset seizure, revoking citizenship, etc. I'm also watching the rich people. If/when they begin to jump ship, I probably will too.
The issue with this regime is that they're attempting all the classic moves of fascism, but they are stupid and incompetent, so they haven't been entirely successful. The question is no longer "Is this a fascist takeover?" but rather, "Will this fascist takeover succeed?" I'm not yet sure enough that it will to uproot my life, and I'm not yet in immediate danger. But I have a plan and a go-bag should that change.
What History Teaches
• Fascist takeovers often look sloppy or absurd until they’re suddenly entrenched. Many contemporaries underestimated the threat because they thought, “These guys are clowns, they’ll never succeed.”
• Large portions of the population weren’t necessarily ideologically fascist — but they tolerated authoritarianism out of fear, apathy, or because they liked the scapegoating.
• By the time everyone “knew for sure” it was authoritarian, it was too dangerous to resist openly.
Yep, definitely understand the risk of underestimating them. I've really been coming to terms recently with the reality that most (white) people are ultimately going to side with these guys if it gets to that point. It's a hard truth to accept.
Anonymous wrote:The ignorance in this thread is astounding, truly astounding. It is especially so compared to historical political movements.
There is zero chance of an exit ban under this administration, and frankly, why would they institute one? These people would love if the people supposedly talking about this to leave.
Anonymous wrote:At least have a few things in place; make sure passports for the entire family are current, have cash at hand and park some money in an account like HSBC expat. In such situations, your ability to access money is everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Literally no one (besides your coworkers, OP) is talking about this.
That's...not true at all. Lots of people are watching things develop and questioning when it's time to get out of dodge. My household certainly has a "get out" plan in place, we're just watching for specific triggers.
Genuinely curious what your get out triggers are
Many of them have already been tripped (military in our cities, the attempts to criminalize dissent, etc.). The big one I have my eyes on is the prosecution of political enemies, which he is certainly attempting, but the court system itself seems to be holding for the time being. Now if he were to bypass the court system altogether and start locking up/executing/disappearing political enemies, journalists, and activists who are citizens, that'd be a big one. I'm also keeping an eye out for any asset seizure, revoking citizenship, etc. I'm also watching the rich people. If/when they begin to jump ship, I probably will too.
The issue with this regime is that they're attempting all the classic moves of fascism, but they are stupid and incompetent, so they haven't been entirely successful. The question is no longer "Is this a fascist takeover?" but rather, "Will this fascist takeover succeed?" I'm not yet sure enough that it will to uproot my life, and I'm not yet in immediate danger. But I have a plan and a go-bag should that change.
What History Teaches
• Fascist takeovers often look sloppy or absurd until they’re suddenly entrenched. Many contemporaries underestimated the threat because they thought, “These guys are clowns, they’ll never succeed.”
• Large portions of the population weren’t necessarily ideologically fascist — but they tolerated authoritarianism out of fear, apathy, or because they liked the scapegoating.
• By the time everyone “knew for sure” it was authoritarian, it was too dangerous to resist openly.
Anonymous wrote:A Republican from Florida (Brian Mast) introduced legislation in early September to revoke passports of “domestic terrorists”; however, his definition of domestic terrorism includes anyone with views different from his own. It’s not hard to see the slippery slope.
Anonymous wrote:The fevered imaginations some of you (proudly?) display are unreal.
Anonymous wrote:The ignorance in this thread is astounding, truly astounding. It is especially so compared to historical political movements.
There is zero chance of an exit ban under this administration, and frankly, why would they institute one? These people would love if the people supposedly talking about this to leave.