Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I with both parties would nominate better candidates for all elections. I really dislike having to vote for the "least bad" candidate.
I wasn't born yet, but the most recent President I really like was Eisenhower.
- signed, A Moderate independent voter
+1 Basic background investigations should be the minimum requirement for anyone running for any office or position. There are not enough decent law abiding people anymore anywhere!
If we eliminate everyone with a speeding ticket will there be anyone left?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican nominee in Virginia linked to Nazi P*rn blog. A pornographic blog linked to Virginia lieutenant governor candidate John Reid shared content from accounts that fetishized Nazism
WHAT
This actually true? Also needs to go!
Hashmi is fine, right, only wants a Casino? I don’t want a casino, but that has to take a back seat.
Won’t vote for anyone who is not clean legally, that should be the most basic requirement.
So these are just allegations about Reid, of being “tied to” something along those lines. (He denies)
Jones’ speeding of nearly 120 mph in 2022 was actually convicted. And he admits “it was a mistake”. It’s on the news.
They are not running for the same position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.
It was more than a speeding ticket, it was reckless driving, which may be a felony in Virginia.
It was a speeding ticket. Not a felony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I with both parties would nominate better candidates for all elections. I really dislike having to vote for the "least bad" candidate.
I wasn't born yet, but the most recent President I really like was Eisenhower.
- signed, A Moderate independent voter
+1 Basic background investigations should be the minimum requirement for anyone running for any office or position. There are not enough decent law abiding people anymore anywhere!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.
Why? So 116 mph! You are kidding to point out 4 mph? The 4 mph make no difference in effects. No chance of survival for anyone in that car or any car near it. It was recent, too, 2022.
Serious lack of judgement, reckless, public endangerment. Great candidate.
How are they not doing a basic background check before they have people getting into a position for candidacy? Serious question!
“But it’s just a small lie”. Very telling that Republicans lie every single chance they get.
It’s a speeding ticket. He still has infinitely better judgment than any Republican in 2025.
Better judgment? There’s a 100% chance you’ll kill someone if you hit them going that fast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.
It was more than a speeding ticket, it was reckless driving, which may be a felony in Virginia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.
Why? So 116 mph! You are kidding to point out 4 mph? The 4 mph make no difference in effects. No chance of survival for anyone in that car or any car near it. It was recent, too, 2022.
Serious lack of judgement, reckless, public endangerment. Great candidate.
How are they not doing a basic background check before they have people getting into a position for candidacy? Serious question!
“But it’s just a small lie”. Very telling that Republicans lie every single chance they get.
It’s a speeding ticket. He still has infinitely better judgment than any Republican in 2025.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.
Why? So 116 mph! You are kidding to point out 4 mph? The 4 mph make no difference in effects. No chance of survival for anyone in that car or any car near it. It was recent, too, 2022.
Serious lack of judgement, reckless, public endangerment. Great candidate.
How are they not doing a basic background check before they have people getting into a position for candidacy? Serious question!
Anonymous wrote:I with both parties would nominate better candidates for all elections. I really dislike having to vote for the "least bad" candidate.
I wasn't born yet, but the most recent President I really like was Eisenhower.
- signed, A Moderate independent voter
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republican nominee in Virginia linked to Nazi P*rn blog. A pornographic blog linked to Virginia lieutenant governor candidate John Reid shared content from accounts that fetishized Nazism
WHAT
This actually true? Also needs to go!
Hashmi is fine, right, only wants a Casino? I don’t want a casino, but that has to take a back seat.
Won’t vote for anyone who is not clean legally, that should be the most basic requirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all of these offenses not immediately disqualifying for all candidates of any party? If convicted, should be disqualified for public office, end of story!
It’s a speeding ticket FFS
Have you any idea of a speed of 120 mph? Have you ever driven that fast?
There is no survival possible for those in that car and any car that is unlucky enough to coexist with that speed.
It wasn’t 120mph.
Like I said, it’s a speeding ticket F F S.
OP is a POS.