Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about IXL? Anyone's school uses it? I'm so over it. This is in a Catholic school.
yes. our school is obsessed. give an award to the top leaderboard scores so the kids get more computer time trying to win
One of the parochial schools we considered used it to provide enrichment to more advanced learners. We decided against that school in favor of a school that uses zero EdTech (and I mean absolutely none. It's wonderful!)
IXL actually does publish some math workbooks that are pretty good. Bought one for my daughter and I've been pleased with the quality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about IXL? Anyone's school uses it? I'm so over it. This is in a Catholic school.
yes. our school is obsessed. give an award to the top leaderboard scores so the kids get more computer time trying to win
One of the parochial schools we considered used it to provide enrichment to more advanced learners. We decided against that school in favor of a school that uses zero EdTech (and I mean absolutely none. It's wonderful!)
IXL actually does publish some math workbooks that are pretty good. Bought one for my daughter and I've been pleased with the quality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about IXL? Anyone's school uses it? I'm so over it. This is in a Catholic school.
yes. our school is obsessed. give an award to the top leaderboard scores so the kids get more computer time trying to win
Anonymous wrote:What about IXL? Anyone's school uses it? I'm so over it. This is in a Catholic school.
Anonymous wrote:We should go back to states and chalk, amrite?
Y’all are ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We should go back to states and chalk, amrite?
Y’all are ridiculous.
maybe we should. have you talked to a longtime teacher lately. the drop after 2012-15 or so is crazy ( when iphones/ipads really took off)
Anonymous wrote:We should go back to states and chalk, amrite?
Y’all are ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure that I understand the objection. I suppose that we could argue that buying Chromebooks at the elementary level isn't the best use of limited school-district resources, but children do need to learn how to be computer-literate. Researching stuff on the Internet is at least as important as learning how to use library resources. I know that people my age (late 40s) spent significant time in library class in elementary school, learning how to find information. These basic skills served me well thorugh my secondary and college education. This is still necessary for children today, but they also need to know how to use online search functionality, how to evaluate the quality of a given source, and how to prepare a bibliography including Internet sources.
If your kids are playing games all day, then the teacher has a classroom-management problem. This isn't a problem with the technology.
So you managed to develop computer skills, online research skills, online literacy etc WITHOUT being issued a personal chromebook in elementary? In other words, it is completely unnecessary. I hate the argument that kids NEED them in order to develop computer skills.
And people managed to get places by horse and buggy. Your point? 🙄
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure that I understand the objection. I suppose that we could argue that buying Chromebooks at the elementary level isn't the best use of limited school-district resources, but children do need to learn how to be computer-literate. Researching stuff on the Internet is at least as important as learning how to use library resources. I know that people my age (late 40s) spent significant time in library class in elementary school, learning how to find information. These basic skills served me well thorugh my secondary and college education. This is still necessary for children today, but they also need to know how to use online search functionality, how to evaluate the quality of a given source, and how to prepare a bibliography including Internet sources.
If your kids are playing games all day, then the teacher has a classroom-management problem. This isn't a problem with the technology.
So you managed to develop computer skills, online research skills, online literacy etc WITHOUT being issued a personal chromebook in elementary? In other words, it is completely unnecessary. I hate the argument that kids NEED them in order to develop computer skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly think we will look back at this and see it like smoking while pregnant or not using car seats. What were we thinking??? That is if we don't fully turn into Idiocracy by then.
The sad thing is this is just one more way that poor and rich kids will be different. Rich kids at private schools learn cursive and how to read novels. They develop attention spans. Poor kids get ed tech with ads shoved in their faces for 80% of the day.
And rich kids can put on their resumes “Perfect Cursive Handwriting“
My three read books and learned cursive but didn’t have to continue it. I think it was mostly to be able to read it when reading old documents and letters. There are no benefits to writing in cursive. If a student does better with cursive fine, but not necessary.
One read The Outsiders and The Giver in the sixth grade. They are reading a contemporary novel right now but I forget the name. Shakespeare comes in the 8th grade and they put on a Shakespeare play.
I remember two years ago my daughter read Roll of Thunder, Hear my Cry, The Family Under the Bridge and Holes in the 4th grade.
I think some posters claiming their kids don’t read complete books are trolls. How can they not read complete novels and why wouldn’t they? Mine are in public school and none of that is true.
As for Chromebooks you can block ads. The schools should have done that for the students. Most schools use Chromebooks for some subjects and notebooks for others.
I wouldn’t wait longer than middle school for the students to be using a laptop. The longer they use them the more adept they are. They type faster with fewer errors. They can manage three screens being open to work on an assignment with ease. They know how to use all of the tools. You don’t want the poor kid trying to use her thumbs to type like an iPhone. You want the laptop to be second nature.
There are actually a lot of benefits to kids learning cursive, far beyond reading old documents. Look it up
+1. And the narrowmindedness of “it’s this way at our school, so it must be this way at yours” is nothing to be proud of.
When you have a top performing public school, and others have serious complaints about their schools not doing their jobs, the way it’s done in the high test scoring schools might be more helpful.
Learning to write well is important. Learning cursive isn’t. It’s nice to be able to write in cursive fast and flawlessly but it’s not possible for every student. Maybe make it an elective class for children of parents who can’t let it go.
The “top performing” school are top performing because of all the enrichment (either directly or indirectly) kids and their parents do outside of school. It isn’t the teachers or curriculum- those things are more or less standardized and follow what the state tells them.
They are apparently outperforming the schools that don’t read full books and cheap programs with ads on Chromebooks. That has to be some of it. These communities who only read snippets also have involved parents. I’m sure the teachers are fine but if students aren’t reading complete age appropriate novels by 2nd grade they wouldn’t do as well as schools that do. Same thing with grammar, and it’s not just the Catholics who teach it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly think we will look back at this and see it like smoking while pregnant or not using car seats. What were we thinking??? That is if we don't fully turn into Idiocracy by then.
The sad thing is this is just one more way that poor and rich kids will be different. Rich kids at private schools learn cursive and how to read novels. They develop attention spans. Poor kids get ed tech with ads shoved in their faces for 80% of the day.
And rich kids can put on their resumes “Perfect Cursive Handwriting“
My three read books and learned cursive but didn’t have to continue it. I think it was mostly to be able to read it when reading old documents and letters. There are no benefits to writing in cursive. If a student does better with cursive fine, but not necessary.
One read The Outsiders and The Giver in the sixth grade. They are reading a contemporary novel right now but I forget the name. Shakespeare comes in the 8th grade and they put on a Shakespeare play.
I remember two years ago my daughter read Roll of Thunder, Hear my Cry, The Family Under the Bridge and Holes in the 4th grade.
I think some posters claiming their kids don’t read complete books are trolls. How can they not read complete novels and why wouldn’t they? Mine are in public school and none of that is true.
As for Chromebooks you can block ads. The schools should have done that for the students. Most schools use Chromebooks for some subjects and notebooks for others.
I wouldn’t wait longer than middle school for the students to be using a laptop. The longer they use them the more adept they are. They type faster with fewer errors. They can manage three screens being open to work on an assignment with ease. They know how to use all of the tools. You don’t want the poor kid trying to use her thumbs to type like an iPhone. You want the laptop to be second nature.
There are actually a lot of benefits to kids learning cursive, far beyond reading old documents. Look it up
+1. And the narrowmindedness of “it’s this way at our school, so it must be this way at yours” is nothing to be proud of.
When you have a top performing public school, and others have serious complaints about their schools not doing their jobs, the way it’s done in the high test scoring schools might be more helpful.
Learning to write well is important. Learning cursive isn’t. It’s nice to be able to write in cursive fast and flawlessly but it’s not possible for every student. Maybe make it an elective class for children of parents who can’t let it go.
The “top performing” school are top performing because of all the enrichment (either directly or indirectly) kids and their parents do outside of school. It isn’t the teachers or curriculum- those things are more or less standardized and follow what the state tells them.
They are apparently outperforming the schools that don’t read full books and cheap programs with ads on Chromebooks. That has to be some of it. These communities who only read snippets also have involved parents. I’m sure the teachers are fine but if students aren’t reading complete age appropriate novels by 2nd grade they wouldn’t do as well as schools that do. Same thing with grammar, and it’s not just the Catholics who teach it.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly think we will look back at this and see it like smoking while pregnant or not using car seats. What were we thinking??? That is if we don't fully turn into Idiocracy by then.
The sad thing is this is just one more way that poor and rich kids will be different. Rich kids at private schools learn cursive and how to read novels. They develop attention spans. Poor kids get ed tech with ads shoved in their faces for 80% of the day.