Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is the one I don't understand.
Large number of first years spend semester or full year abroad with sub par professors who have been put out to pasture. Some Co-ops are great but lots are menial jobs. Not sure how kids who get that much less coursework than students from other colleges can compete in grad schools??
I know Northeastern gamed the system (to their credit, by following the rules) to get a better ranking, but it is ironically now one of the most underrated schools by US News. Most schools would kill for its admissions rate, even for what its admit rate would be without the spring admits etc (higher, sure, but still pretty low). In fact, several Boston schools — BC, BU, Northeastern, Tufts — are very underrated by US News.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kenyon and Dickinson get pumped by private high school parents but both are ranked 45th in 2026. No momentum for them. Colgate and Haverford have declined in recent past. Holy Cross inching up each year now 27th. And Bucknell will it’s magical Pipeline to The Street is now 30.
I'm very excited for my kid to go to Kenyon next year. Could not possibly care less about some dumb ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern is the one I don't understand.
Large number of first years spend semester or full year abroad with sub par professors who have been put out to pasture. Some Co-ops are great but lots are menial jobs. Not sure how kids who get that much less coursework than students from other colleges can compete in grad schools??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feels like this year's ranking is very similar to last year's. Someone should compute the average change in rank (rise and drop both treated as positive) for last year's t50 schools. My guess is the average is less than 3. Repeat this for last year's t100 and my guess is the average is less than 5.
Where TF have you been??? It is always the same. Very little change. I’ve been watching these ratings since the 90s. The only change was when some schools—NE, UChic., etc started driving up applicants and plating the mailing and ED game, test optional to appear more selective.
I mean what, you think Harvard and Princeton will drop out of the T10?
Selectivity has nothing to do with the rankings. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/how-us-news-calculated-the-rankings
It highly correlates with the peer surveys, so it indirectly still does.
Correlation is not causality.