Anonymous wrote:Good!!
Be held accountable for all of that hate that you spew here.
- former Dem, now centrist who is politically homeless
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.
Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info
so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?
How does the overly simplistic woke chant go again?
Oh that’s right.
Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
How does that RWNJ anti woke chant go? If anyone speaks up kill them!
I think this past week has proved that the chant is actually one embraced by the left.
Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?
Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.
Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info
so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?
How does the overly simplistic woke chant go again?
Oh that’s right.
Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
How does that RWNJ anti woke chant go? If anyone speaks up kill them!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.
Good.
Why is this good?
It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?
Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?
You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?
You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.
I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.
But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.
Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.
Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info.
so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk.amp
Here is a good example.
You can disagree with the administration or the govt.
This federal worker was suspended.
But if he just said he disagreed with the govt flying the flags at half-staff for Kirk, that is fine, his right.
It when he threw in there that Kirk was a “Racist Homophobe”, that crosses the line into slander. He deserved the suspension for getting personal and making these accusations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.
Good.
Why is this good?
It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?
Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to be careful here, too.
Your IP address is attached to every post you write here. Jeff has said he saves this info. If he received a subpoena, he will have to give that up. Then, poof, a lawyer or whoever has all your info
so we are officially at this point where we are only allowed to agree with this administration. Freedom of speech is done?
How does the overly simplistic woke chant go again?
Oh that’s right.
Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk
I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.
But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.
I would be especially careful about what you say about Israel. That information will be and could be used against you to say that you're anti-Semitic. Possibly even end up on some list like Canary mission.