Anonymous wrote:I think schools are moving back because of the sheer number of applicants. It becomes overwhelming for AOs and the entire system.
I sincerely doubt any university is experiencing a noticeable drop in quality of the student body because of test optional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Entitled parents sending their kids to SAT prep courses perpetuates inequities and only serves to widen the racial achievement gap. Wealthier students have unfair access to test preparation resources overall, which leads to unearned higher scores. This only heightens unearned white privilege and diminished access to education for BIPOCs.
And yet standardized testing is thought to be less influenced by wealth than high school attended, extracurriculars, jobs/internships, legacy and of course, donations.
As a UC parent I can honestly tell you we can buy our way into any private high school, the most unique ECs, and the most convincing essays. But prep after prep DC cannot get a 1300+ in sat. I genuinely wish every school is test blind so we could have more options.
I hear this a lot. People keep perpetuating the lie that 1500 scores are common and bought by test prep. No. It’s the smart immigrant kids getting 1500.
At a certain minimum, the sat has nothing to do with intelligence but how much effort you want to put into the sat. Our DD went from a 1300 to a 1590, and it was just because she studied for the damn thing.
Anonymous wrote:I wish the college board would revise the SAT scores back to how they were when we were kids in the 90s. There is almost no differentiation now but tremendous pressure to get super high scores.
Back in the day 1400 almost guaranteed Ivy. Now you wouldn't have a shot (unless super hooked). Kids are not that much smarter or better prepared. Revise the test.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Entitled parents sending their kids to SAT prep courses perpetuates inequities and only serves to widen the racial achievement gap. Wealthier students have unfair access to test preparation resources overall, which leads to unearned higher scores. This only heightens unearned white privilege and diminished access to education for BIPOCs.
And yet standardized testing is thought to be less influenced by wealth than high school attended, extracurriculars, jobs/internships, legacy and of course, donations.
As a UC parent I can honestly tell you we can buy our way into any private high school, the most unique ECs, and the most convincing essays. But prep after prep DC cannot get a 1300+ in sat. I genuinely wish every school is test blind so we could have more options.
I hear this a lot. People keep perpetuating the lie that 1500 scores are common and bought by test prep. No. It’s the smart immigrant kids getting 1500.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Entitled parents sending their kids to SAT prep courses perpetuates inequities and only serves to widen the racial achievement gap. Wealthier students have unfair access to test preparation resources overall, which leads to unearned higher scores. This only heightens unearned white privilege and diminished access to education for BIPOCs.
And yet standardized testing is thought to be less influenced by wealth than high school attended, extracurriculars, jobs/internships, legacy and of course, donations.
As a UC parent I can honestly tell you we can buy our way into any private high school, the most unique ECs, and the most convincing essays. But prep after prep DC cannot get a 1300+ in sat. I genuinely wish every school is test blind so we could have more options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want the US to align itself with the rest of the world and only consider academics. Test scores should be a lot more central to the applications than they are now.
Nobody’s stopping you from moving to South Korea or India for their superior high stakes test based education system.
Unless the PP is a citizen of those countries, there is actually something stopping them from moving to those countries.
But, even so, more and more universities here are moving to test required, for a reason.
Yeah, it’s really hard to sort through 60,000 identical applications.
“My kid is good at the test therefore it’s the best measure of talent”, sure thing boss.
It is. Only someone who doesn't score well would scoff at this essential truth.
I got eleven million on the SATs, pack it up failures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Better to use test scores than to hand out admission spots to jackasses who had their mommy start a fake charity (that is abandoned once the kid is admitted).
Don't forget about fake testing accommodations.
But taking the test six times and cherry picking the best results from different tests is still cool, right?
UMC whites do it all the time, even WITH testing accommodations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of the top 75 colleges, including SLACs, how many are test required?
Vast majority of unhooked applicants/admits submit scores to top75, including SLACs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A standardized test is far better than going by inflated grades and faked extra-curriculars
1000+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Entitled parents sending their kids to SAT prep courses perpetuates inequities and only serves to widen the racial achievement gap. Wealthier students have unfair access to test preparation resources overall, which leads to unearned higher scores. This only heightens unearned white privilege and diminished access to education for BIPOCs.
And yet standardized testing is thought to be less influenced by wealth than high school attended, extracurriculars, jobs/internships, legacy and of course, donations.
Anonymous wrote:Entitled parents sending their kids to SAT prep courses perpetuates inequities and only serves to widen the racial achievement gap. Wealthier students have unfair access to test preparation resources overall, which leads to unearned higher scores. This only heightens unearned white privilege and diminished access to education for BIPOCs.