Anonymous wrote:All of these are not exclusive to marriage or a given because of marriage alone.
To claim marriage instantly bestows these things is false.
Anonymous wrote:It was the worst decade of my life. I don't recommened it. Literally zero benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Raise children
At 26 years in- I can honestly say if it weren’t for kids there’s no reason to get married (friends, etc., agree)
Anonymous wrote:I think it's having a partner when you go through hard times. Like someone there when you're sick and that kind of thing. I've been married over 30 years, more of my life married than not. I see the good and bad of it. I think having this other person to rely on is the most consistently positive thing over time. I also never feel lonely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these are not exclusive to marriage or a given because of marriage alone.
To claim marriage instantly bestows these things is false.
And they also presuppose a good marriage. I’ve been married 20 years; I think there are pros and cons married or single. Probable the only benefit that actual marriage gets you is that your family unit is viewed by society as more legitimate, if that matters to you.
There are some financial things but you can do some of that outside marriage. If we own our home as a married couple, a lawsuit against only one can’t attach to the house. If only one is on title to main residence with a mortgage and dies, a spouse can continue to live there by paying the mortgage (in MD, anyway). Certain rights upon death, like spousal share of estate. Maybe one of you will be entitled to alimony upon divorce. You can take FMLA and sick leave for some jobs for a spouse but not a lover.
The bolded. + a declaration of commitment - at least at the time of marriage.
You can have kids with someone, and have that person have your back, and be a great coparent, and share house and finances, and bring you soup when you’re sick, without signing a paper.
As long as both of you are on the same page that.
And not one who sees the lack of the signed paper as a lack of commitment.
So marriage is the only thing that gets you FMLA with a cohabiting partner? That’s interesting. I am divorced and financially independent but my partner and I are only in our 40s so this is good to be aware of.
Anonymous wrote:Having someone in your life that has your back, just as you have their’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Timely thread for me... Has been thinking about leaving my wife and starting a new chapter of my life. After 20+ years most of these ‘best parts’ don’t matter or apply anymore.
Just posted below. My DH probably is thinking just like you but is ahead of you on his timeline and only 12 years for us. I think it’s callous or shallow to be bored and not have the depth or imagination to see that there are different best parts coming. But my DH seems convinced that something way more exciting is around the corner and I’m in his way. Along with the kids.
I think you’ll both be disappointed but maybe you’ll prove me wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these are not exclusive to marriage or a given because of marriage alone.
To claim marriage instantly bestows these things is false.
And they also presuppose a good marriage. I’ve been married 20 years; I think there are pros and cons married or single. Probable the only benefit that actual marriage gets you is that your family unit is viewed by society as more legitimate, if that matters to you.
There are some financial things but you can do some of that outside marriage. If we own our home as a married couple, a lawsuit against only one can’t attach to the house. If only one is on title to main residence with a mortgage and dies, a spouse can continue to live there by paying the mortgage (in MD, anyway). Certain rights upon death, like spousal share of estate. Maybe one of you will be entitled to alimony upon divorce. You can take FMLA and sick leave for some jobs for a spouse but not a lover.
The bolded. + a declaration of commitment - at least at the time of marriage.
You can have kids with someone, and have that person have your back, and be a great coparent, and share house and finances, and bring you soup when you’re sick, without signing a paper.
As long as both of you are on the same page that.
And not one who sees the lack of the signed paper as a lack of commitment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of these are not exclusive to marriage or a given because of marriage alone.
To claim marriage instantly bestows these things is false.
And they also presuppose a good marriage. I’ve been married 20 years; I think there are pros and cons married or single. Probable the only benefit that actual marriage gets you is that your family unit is viewed by society as more legitimate, if that matters to you.
There are some financial things but you can do some of that outside marriage. If we own our home as a married couple, a lawsuit against only one can’t attach to the house. If only one is on title to main residence with a mortgage and dies, a spouse can continue to live there by paying the mortgage (in MD, anyway). Certain rights upon death, like spousal share of estate. Maybe one of you will be entitled to alimony upon divorce. You can take FMLA and sick leave for some jobs for a spouse but not a lover.
Anonymous wrote:Having someone in your life that has your back, just as you have their’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having someone in your life that has your back, just as you have their’s.
This^. 1000%