Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid sounds like a trouble maker. Throwing water? Breaking phone usage? Blatant disregard for authority? You have a big problem. I'd start by taking the phone, but the problem is deeper than the phone. I don't know you or your kid, so I can't recommend what will work best, typically I follow consequences related to offense - on this case no phone. In the case of throwing water in a school restroom- cleaning duty of some sort - I'd choose home because it benefits me, but school would be better.
.
She said she has ADHD. When my DD was in 8th grade she was assigned ISS for throwing water in science class doing a lab, she was grounded for with no phone or ipad, but sometimes there is nothing we can do about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything is going to be OK. A suspension will not go on her college application, and in the greater scheme of things, it's not a huge deal, but it will teach her a valuable lesson about respect.
Personally, I agree with your husband that suspension is a little harsh, but I don't think you have grounds for complaint. Schools are trying to crack down on phone use, which is a good thing, and so students will not be given the benefit of the doubt.
Move on. Everything happened as it should. Your kid is a good kid, and the punishment is what it is. No worries, OP.
Me again. My 15 year old daughter with mild ADHD has the opposite problem. She forgets her phone in the classrooms' phone pockets! Last year, one teacher even told her to keep her phone on her because she was forgetting it too often!![]()
Other posters are making this into a bigger deal than it is. No, your kid doesn't have terrible behavior issues. She's just a teen and is learning that rules apply to her as well.
OP listed behavior problem after behavior problem, why are you saying there are no behavior issues?
Because the behaviors are in the range of normal. You should see what the actually troubled kids get up to, PP! None of this is concerning. Consequences have been meted out. There's really nothing to discuss. The kid is 13 and will grow up to be a perfectly decent adult.
Except she has lax parents so she probably won’t.
Anonymous wrote:Lol at "we are trained to protect our phones."
Anonymous wrote:Are you in LCPS?
“Wow, ISS for that? I know she shouldn’t have been on her phone, but detention would’ve made more sense. It’s so early in the school year—kids are still adjusting. Do you know if this was her first referral?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
My read of the rules at our school is parents would be called first and/or detention. ISS to me reads as a possible overreaction/the administration acting on a whim because they're offended she was disrespectful. Respect goes both ways and includes the school following their own policies.
My read of the situation is that the ISS is due to her refusing to give the phone to the Admin. The Admin called her to the office, reminded her she couldn't use the phone, and told her that the consequence was that she needed to give him the phone. She would be able to pick up the phone at the end of the day. If the child had done that, the incident is done and life goes on. She returns to class and has to stop by the office to get her phone before leaving school.
She escalated the situation when she refused to give the phone to the Admin. The consequence for not following the direction, give me your phone and pick it up at the end of the day, was an ISS. Maybe there was a back and forth and it started with a detention, and she still refused to turn over the phone, maybe there wasn't but she 1) used the phone when she wasn't supposed to 2) refused the instruction to give the phone to the Admin.
I would assume that the appeal would be "DD's ADHD makes her impulsive and she does not think through consequences, so we are punishing her for her disability." I suspect that there were a few missing steps in-between the refusal and the suspension because a suspension strikes me as extreme unless there were some in between steps.
I personally think ISS before involving the parents is extreme even if the situation escalated. That's why I'd want to know the policies for cell phones and insubordination. DD doing things wrong doesn't give the admin the right to go outside their own policies (if they did). That would give DD less respect for the authority because they're unfair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything is going to be OK. A suspension will not go on her college application, and in the greater scheme of things, it's not a huge deal, but it will teach her a valuable lesson about respect.
Personally, I agree with your husband that suspension is a little harsh, but I don't think you have grounds for complaint. Schools are trying to crack down on phone use, which is a good thing, and so students will not be given the benefit of the doubt.
Move on. Everything happened as it should. Your kid is a good kid, and the punishment is what it is. No worries, OP.
Me again. My 15 year old daughter with mild ADHD has the opposite problem. She forgets her phone in the classrooms' phone pockets! Last year, one teacher even told her to keep her phone on her because she was forgetting it too often!![]()
Other posters are making this into a bigger deal than it is. No, your kid doesn't have terrible behavior issues. She's just a teen and is learning that rules apply to her as well.
OP listed behavior problem after behavior problem, why are you saying there are no behavior issues?
Because the behaviors are in the range of normal. You should see what the actually troubled kids get up to, PP! None of this is concerning. Consequences have been meted out. There's really nothing to discuss. The kid is 13 and will grow up to be a perfectly decent adult.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everything is going to be OK. A suspension will not go on her college application, and in the greater scheme of things, it's not a huge deal, but it will teach her a valuable lesson about respect.
Personally, I agree with your husband that suspension is a little harsh, but I don't think you have grounds for complaint. Schools are trying to crack down on phone use, which is a good thing, and so students will not be given the benefit of the doubt.
Move on. Everything happened as it should. Your kid is a good kid, and the punishment is what it is. No worries, OP.
Me again. My 15 year old daughter with mild ADHD has the opposite problem. She forgets her phone in the classrooms' phone pockets! Last year, one teacher even told her to keep her phone on her because she was forgetting it too often!![]()
Other posters are making this into a bigger deal than it is. No, your kid doesn't have terrible behavior issues. She's just a teen and is learning that rules apply to her as well.
OP listed behavior problem after behavior problem, why are you saying there are no behavior issues?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
My read of the rules at our school is parents would be called first and/or detention. ISS to me reads as a possible overreaction/the administration acting on a whim because they're offended she was disrespectful. Respect goes both ways and includes the school following their own policies.
My read of the situation is that the ISS is due to her refusing to give the phone to the Admin. The Admin called her to the office, reminded her she couldn't use the phone, and told her that the consequence was that she needed to give him the phone. She would be able to pick up the phone at the end of the day. If the child had done that, the incident is done and life goes on. She returns to class and has to stop by the office to get her phone before leaving school.
She escalated the situation when she refused to give the phone to the Admin. The consequence for not following the direction, give me your phone and pick it up at the end of the day, was an ISS. Maybe there was a back and forth and it started with a detention, and she still refused to turn over the phone, maybe there wasn't but she 1) used the phone when she wasn't supposed to 2) refused the instruction to give the phone to the Admin.
I would assume that the appeal would be "DD's ADHD makes her impulsive and she does not think through consequences, so we are punishing her for her disability." I suspect that there were a few missing steps in-between the refusal and the suspension because a suspension strikes me as extreme unless there were some in between steps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would want to see the policy that allows ISS for the first instance of insubordination and what the cell phone policy says about the refusal. If those policies are unclear, I agree with your husband on fighting it. It seems like a double whammy for essentially one issue to me.
The kid broke the known phone rule (she didn’t forget) and was disrespectful to the AP when she was told to turn the phone over for the rest of the day. You are part of the problem if you fight the consequences for those actions.
My read of the rules at our school is parents would be called first and/or detention. ISS to me reads as a possible overreaction/the administration acting on a whim because they're offended she was disrespectful. Respect goes both ways and includes the school following their own policies.