Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
All of these schools (except Wisconsin) are in economically desirable locations and will continue to grow. Wisconsin is in the worst positions relative to its peers: a ton of state flagships have caught up with it and there’s been no real progresses to the school for 50 years.
wrong
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
All of these schools (except Wisconsin) are in economically desirable locations and will continue to grow. Wisconsin is in the worst positions relative to its peers: a ton of state flagships have caught up with it and there’s been no real progresses to the school for 50 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mI have a Harvard JD colleague with a Rhodes undergrad.
How many Rhodes graduates in the school’s history have attended Harvard Law School?
Likely many. It doesn’t matter where you get your undergrad. It’s all about your LSAT, GPA, and life/work experience. In fact, coming from Tennessee would boost your chances because they get fewer applications from TN than others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have high acceptance rates because they are required by law to take certain in state students. For example, in 2026 - by law - UT Austin will be required to admit any Texas resident in a Texas high school in the top 5% of their class. By law, 75% of UT students must be admitted this way.
I thought this had been around for a while. They admit the top 10% into the Texas state schools. Other states have similar programs.
Anonymous wrote:The peer group at Wisconsin versus Vandy/WashU is not even close to similar. Professors who have taught at both will be quick to tell you they have to water down material for schools with significantly weaker median students.Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
There is a reason law schools have undergrad-tier factors in their GPA algorithm: all undergrads are not the same rigor or education. All T10/15ish are highly similar but come on Wisconsin?? That is like saying the average student at VT is similar to ivy kids. Worlds apart.
Anonymous wrote:They have high acceptance rates because they are required by law to take certain in state students. For example, in 2026 - by law - UT Austin will be required to admit any Texas resident in a Texas high school in the top 5% of their class. By law, 75% of UT students must be admitted this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The peer group at Wisconsin versus Vandy/WashU is not even close to similar. Professors who have taught at both will be quick to tell you they have to water down material for schools with significantly weaker median students.Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
There is a reason law schools have undergrad-tier factors in their GPA algorithm: all undergrads are not the same rigor or education. All T10/15ish are highly similar but come on Wisconsin?? That is like saying the average student at VT is similar to ivy kids. Worlds apart.
Yes, because we went in a time machine and it's the 90's.
Anonymous wrote:The peer group at Wisconsin versus Vandy/WashU is not even close to similar. Professors who have taught at both will be quick to tell you they have to water down material for schools with significantly weaker median students.Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
There is a reason law schools have undergrad-tier factors in their GPA algorithm: all undergrads are not the same rigor or education. All T10/15ish are highly similar but come on Wisconsin?? That is like saying the average student at VT is similar to ivy kids. Worlds apart.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mI have a Harvard JD colleague with a Rhodes undergrad.
How many Rhodes graduates in the school’s history have attended Harvard Law School?
Likely many. It doesn’t matter where you get your undergrad. It’s all about your LSAT, GPA, and life/work experience. In fact, coming from Tennessee would boost your chances because they get fewer applications from TN than others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mI have a Harvard JD colleague with a Rhodes undergrad.
How many Rhodes graduates in the school’s history have attended Harvard Law School?
Likely many. It doesn’t matter where you get your undergrad. It’s all about your LSAT, GPA, and life/work experience. In fact, coming from Tennessee would boost your chances because they get fewer applications from TN than others.
The peer group at Wisconsin versus Vandy/WashU is not even close to similar. Professors who have taught at both will be quick to tell you they have to water down material for schools with significantly weaker median students.Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed that some of the best (but not “very best”) public universities still have high acceptance rates in 2025?
Two of the most shocking are Illinois and Washington, some of the best research stem schools with global brands, but the acceptance rate is 40%.
UT Austin’s acceptance rate is 30%, and had many great departments across the board, most of which match or surpass UVa/UNC
Wisconsin is the most shocking of all, with a 40% acceptance rate, despite a distinguished history.
If you put any of these “A-“ publics up against privates such as Vanderbilt or Washu, they are academically competitive but the acceptance rate for the ladder two are much lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mI have a Harvard JD colleague with a Rhodes undergrad.
How many Rhodes graduates in the school’s history have attended Harvard Law School?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[mI have a Harvard JD colleague with a Rhodes undergrad.
How many Rhodes graduates in the school’s history have attended Harvard Law School?
There is a Rhodes grad on the Supreme Court, so they must be doing something right.
One graduate is probative evidence?