Anonymous wrote:One of the lowest/no cost option had the late start elementary school kids getting off buses at 5pm and not starting until like 9:40. There was all this talk about older kids not being able to watch siblings, but I think a MUCH larger group that was ignored in this calculation is the number of parents who currently flex their schedules to get kids on the bus at 8:45-9 that can still make a 9am call from home or make it into the office before 10. Shifting "just 30 minutes" makes a normal government hours workday impossible.
As someone who has taught at all 3 levels, this change also does not take into account that many teachers work at the level they do because it works with their commute/own child's school schedule. If it is changed, it will lead to massive shifts around the county and may also force some teachers to go to another county.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you have all gone soft. Get the kids out of bed. It has been done for decades.
Goodness knows all this hand wringing over start times has been stupid and has caused logistical headaches of our own creation.
+1
I’ve had multiple kids go through middle school and they survived high school and got into college with zero trauma from the middle school start time.
Anonymous wrote:One of the lowest/no cost option had the late start elementary school kids getting off buses at 5pm and not starting until like 9:40. There was all this talk about older kids not being able to watch siblings, but I think a MUCH larger group that was ignored in this calculation is the number of parents who currently flex their schedules to get kids on the bus at 8:45-9 that can still make a 9am call from home or make it into the office before 10. Shifting "just 30 minutes" makes a normal government hours workday impossible.
As someone who has taught at all 3 levels, this change also does not take into account that many teachers work at the level they do because it works with their commute/own child's school schedule. If it is changed, it will lead to massive shifts around the county and may also force some teachers to go to another county.
Anonymous wrote:I think you have all gone soft. Get the kids out of bed. It has been done for decades.
Goodness knows all this hand wringing over start times has been stupid and has caused logistical headaches of our own creation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having a child that is new to the middle school schedule, I would like to say that it's been fine. And, it's only 2 years. Dc is already looking forward to getting to sleep in for HS
I am glad your kid think it is fine. Mine thought it was awful and grades suffered. Do we cancel each other out now?
Anonymous wrote:School start times should be based on the best needs of the children, not a bus schedule.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If start times for middle school move later than 8 (possibly 830) it will decimate my department at my school. So many of them can't make the later start time work with their commute.
Middle school teachers need to organize and speak up.
Reid is hell bent on destroying the schedule for everyone to appease a tiny handful of middle school parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having a child that is new to the middle school schedule, I would like to say that it's been fine. And, it's only 2 years. Dc is already looking forward to getting to sleep in for HS
I am glad your kid think it is fine. Mine thought it was awful and grades suffered. Do we cancel each other out now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to see the county take some of these mega HSs and turn them into secondary schools like Lake Braddock model.
This would naturally solve some of the boundary issues, sorry no room, you can't be bussed 45 miles across town. You'd need less buses, and the ones you have would be driving shorter distances, so can easily get from Secondary school to ES pickups/drop offs.
Everyone gets a reasonable start time. I have a middle schooler, they'd have to go to bed at 8pm to get all of the sleep they need.
3000+ capacity HSs are not good for anyone.
Why not do 2 separate schools within a school, smaller classes, but numbers would still be high enough to offer reasonable diversity of classes, accessible sport teams. Fear of big kids/mixing with younger kids, modify bells schedules, and build modify shared spaces for separate cafeterias, gyms, libraries etc.
Lake braddock was built as a secondary school.
The high schools were not
We love the larger 2500-3000 high school.
You get so much of a higher level/talented cohort for everything from sports to musicals, Orchestra and academics. The bigger talent pool means more competition, which produces a much higher quality outcome.
This is a dumb reason for bigger schools. Participation rates are more important than achieving the highest possible “quality outcome”.
What good does it do to have a high performing sports team or musical or whatever when more kids get left out?
Anonymous wrote:Having a child that is new to the middle school schedule, I would like to say that it's been fine. And, it's only 2 years. Dc is already looking forward to getting to sleep in for HS