Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
That isn’t reasonable.
Teachers can have soda in front of students. Some teachers have coffee or tea. Even energy drinks. This is ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
DP. Soda isn’t poison.
Unfortunately, paras are regularly denied their contractual breaks during the day. Her problem was drinking and eating unhealthy snacks in the same room
As kids. It’s kicking a child.
It was disruptive classroom behind. If you are taking a snack break, you leave the room. Kicking a child is worse than leaving the room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
No, but they obviously shouldn't have it in the classroom in front of students. Come on.
Anonymous wrote:Teaching and nursing attract sociopaths. No joke. Where are you going to go if you want to be mean to people? You would seek out vulnerable populations. Anyone who wants to work with kids, patients, or the elderly should be assessed for sociopathy. It should be a requirement for employment.[/
Yes! All the mean girls in HS became nurses or teachers! The worst became gym teachers…
Anonymous wrote:Special education is crazy expensive. MCPS cannot keep pouring more and more money into it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
Anonymous wrote:Cannot blame MCPS for this incident. Impossible to perfectly screen every individual. It is possible that she didn’t mean to kick him but meant to just stop him. Teachers should be allowed to have a drink in the classroom
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow that sounds pretty bad.
When first seeing the title, I was willing to get the paraeducator the benefit of the doubt. Where something might've been incidental contact and blown out of proportion. And not to offend anyone but being identified as Special Ed can be a very wide spectrum and for a variety of reasons.
But to be actually be able to kick a kid in the chest seems to be pretty deliberate.
No injury reported.
My guess is the para was sitting in a chair and she pushed the kid away with her foot when he grabbed her drink (which she absolutely should not have had in the classroom).
This is why you shouldn't bring in minimum wage untrained people off the street to care for disabled students.
Why not?
It was soda.
Are teachers prohibited from having soda?
Anonymous wrote:I'm not going to post links, but the accused in this case puts her "career-limiting move" choices on the Internet with photographic evidence.