Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1
Where’s your evidence for these claims?
DP. SCOTUS ruling on Harvard lawsuit?
That ruling means Cornell’s essay on community is unlawful?! Seems like a stretch…the SCOTUS case found race-based affirmative action is unlawful.
They found Harvard practiced racial discrimination in college admissions. They don’t have to sue every single college.
Isn’t that also true for legacies?
And white lacrosse players?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1
Where’s your evidence for these claims?
DP. SCOTUS ruling on Harvard lawsuit?
That ruling means Cornell’s essay on community is unlawful?! Seems like a stretch…the SCOTUS case found race-based affirmative action is unlawful.
They found Harvard practiced racial discrimination in college admissions. They don’t have to sue every single college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two years ago, SCOTUS said no more using race the way it was being used.
Please explain why AOs would break the law. What’s in it for them?
A college essay question about the topic of community isn’t breaking the law. I see you haven’t yet actually read the SCOTUS opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago, SCOTUS said no more using race the way it was being used.
Please explain why AOs would break the law. What’s in it for them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, of course they don’t have to sue every college but the findings were pretty specific about how Harvard gave preferences to White applicants over Asians. Drawing that to an essay about community (very standard question for many colleges) is extreme. This administration is attacking higher education and bullying institutions into submission under the guise of undoing DEI.
+1. No maga actually want to attend any of these institutions. They just want to try to destroy them.
Not maga but we want to destroy all the woke nonsense in those institutions and we’re doing it. What are you gonna do about it? Cry me a river ?😅
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, of course they don’t have to sue every college but the findings were pretty specific about how Harvard gave preferences to White applicants over Asians. Drawing that to an essay about community (very standard question for many colleges) is extreme. This administration is attacking higher education and bullying institutions into submission under the guise of undoing DEI.
+1. No maga actually want to attend any of these institutions. They just want to try to destroy them.
Anonymous wrote:No, of course they don’t have to sue every college but the findings were pretty specific about how Harvard gave preferences to White applicants over Asians. Drawing that to an essay about community (very standard question for many colleges) is extreme. This administration is attacking higher education and bullying institutions into submission under the guise of undoing DEI.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1
Where’s your evidence for these claims?
DP. SCOTUS ruling on Harvard lawsuit?
That ruling means Cornell’s essay on community is unlawful?! Seems like a stretch…the SCOTUS case found race-based affirmative action is unlawful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1
Where’s your evidence for these claims?
DP. SCOTUS ruling on Harvard lawsuit?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1
Where’s your evidence for these claims?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The government going after a private institution for college admissions essays on the topic of being part of community should be condemned!
Not when that private institution receives billions of government funding every year but actively practices racial discrimination!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So what happens when the mediocre kids still don’t get in? Will they start replacing the AOs next?
The problem was that mediocre kids with the right skin color were getting in over better kids with the wrong skin color.
+1