Anonymous wrote:Your son is in the military and posted overseas. I hope he will have a very safe and uneventful military career, but life is unpredictable, especially military life. No way would I give up the chance to see my child. But I would be clear that’s what I was doing. Instead of “I have dinner plans”, it would be “Larlo is in the military, stationed overseas, and there’s no telling when I might see him again, so I’m not going to give up this time.”
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the “4 weeks to go to Australia is crazy” mentality. If you already have a passport and money isn’t an issue, what’s hard about that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you didn't snark about the cathedral, it would be easier to have sympathy.
I only mentioned the cathedral because that seemed to signal that they wanted to hold a big, opulent event that would require lots of advance notice and planning. And we would have loved the run-up and the event itself. As it is, it now sounds like their wedding is going to be more low-key.
Thanks to your comments, I'm coming around to the view that he should go solo to his brother's wedding, to avoid any long-term resentment from them. Although I was included on the invitation, I'll still take my lovely children and brother to the restaurant and try to find a window for a repeat when everyone can be there - and be relaxed and happy - even though that's unlikely to be any time this year now.
I've never had an issue with DH's family before, but this has opened my eyes to some dynamics. Not least, the way the celebration plans for his wife (i.e. me) are dismissed. I also wonder whether BIL's fiancee's dreams of a cathedral wedding were similarly dismissed. I've in the past detected a hint of familial misogyny - not from DH - but the all-male environment when they're together can get a bit much.
Anonymous wrote:You show up, with a smile on your face. Or at least your husband shows up. How is this even a question?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you didn't snark about the cathedral, it would be easier to have sympathy.
I only mentioned the cathedral because that seemed to signal that they wanted to hold a big, opulent event that would require lots of advance notice and planning. And we would have loved the run-up and the event itself. As it is, it now sounds like their wedding is going to be more low-key.
Thanks to your comments, I'm coming around to the view that he should go solo to his brother's wedding, to avoid any long-term resentment from them. Although I was included on the invitation, I'll still take my lovely children and brother to the restaurant and try to find a window for a repeat when everyone can be there - and be relaxed and happy - even though that's unlikely to be any time this year now.
I've never had an issue with DH's family before, but this has opened my eyes to some dynamics. Not least, the way the celebration plans for his wife (i.e. me) are dismissed. I also wonder whether BIL's fiancee's dreams of a cathedral wedding were similarly dismissed. I've in the past detected a hint of familial misogyny - not from DH - but the all-male environment when they're together can get a bit much.
Anonymous wrote:Is there any chance to do the dinner another date? I see the party you can't move, but maybe the dinner you can. I have always regretted the close family wedding I couldn't attend.
Anonymous wrote:If you didn't snark about the cathedral, it would be easier to have sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Traveling to Australia on four weeks notice is. not. reasonable.