Really weird post. Buyer's remorse?Anonymous wrote:Take the money you spent on this and save it for college
Moving forward things about college are going to change especially in who will be accepted and costs.
Lax is not a life long sport.
Mother of more than one division one player,
That point was about the only thing that was accurate in the OP's post. What he meant was that with the high academic schools involved in lacrosse, of which there are plenty, lacrosse players can get into those schools where they otherwise would have no chance. Accurate.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Participation numbers have plateaued in the traditional hotbeds, but the game is still growing across the country. The clubs will milk the south, Midwest and west and long as parents will pay - and they will keep paying. Even with twice as many kids in the lax system as there are now, it’s still the easiest path to collegiate athletics (and a likely step up in academics) - especially for upper-middle and upper class kids.
LOL step up in academics no
Anonymous wrote:You are the customer but only in proportion on how good your child is.
Anonymous wrote:Participation numbers have plateaued in the traditional hotbeds, but the game is still growing across the country. The clubs will milk the south, Midwest and west and long as parents will pay - and they will keep paying. Even with twice as many kids in the lax system as there are now, it’s still the easiest path to collegiate athletics (and a likely step up in academics) - especially for upper-middle and upper class kids.
Anonymous wrote:What clubs are you referring to? I've yet to hear a parent have any leverage. Some get free or heavily discounted fees and extra playing time, If they complain or if that playing time disappears because the player isn't as good as thought, there's no leverage. It's quite the opposite, speak up at all and you are told to take it or leave it.
Anonymous wrote:You are the customer but only in proportion on how good your child is.
Anonymous wrote:You are the customer but only in proportion on how good your child is.
Anonymous wrote:Agreed. 24 is not too many, though I would try to cap it there. IMO 22-24 is the best number. It also just doesn't take much to get to 22.
5 attack
5 defense
6 mid
2 lsm
2 fogo
2 goalie
Add a couple ssdm's, and you're at 24.
As the PP noted, having too tight of a roster can put a team in some peril if kids get gassed or there are injuries. Over 24 is a PIA for the coaches to manage equitably.