Anonymous wrote:Not to pile on, OP at 109 lbs, but I guarantee you don’t look well. And I’m not jealous. I have a relative who very proudly is showing off her new “figure” all while we gasp at her emaciated appearance. She’s gone from a cute, smiley 50 year old to a frail, positively elderly looking woman in one year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:109 is unhealthy range unless you’re 5 feet.
I'm 5'3" and I'm not considered under weight at 109. I'll be on this drug forever and I'm fine with that.
same. 109 is my goal weight and i definitely don't look too think at that weight. T that weight, I fit a size 2 (American vanity size 2) but not size 0 or 00 like in my 30s when I was 106 and still no where near heroin chic.
You must have no muscle mass. I'm 123 at 5'3", and am a size 2 (waist). Size 4 if I need some non-wide legged pants.
I would look positively sick at 109.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't maintaining the dose that helped you lose half your body weight continue to result in weight loss? It seems nuts that your provider thinks you need to continue that dose?
Did you change your overall eating and fitness habits while you were losing? If so, I'm not sure why you would need the meds to maintain unless your metabolism is messed up to the point where you need to only eat 1000 calories (I'm larger than you at 5'4 and 120, but I can maintain this weight at 2000 calories)
Anonymous wrote:8:53: what is your microdose size?
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't maintaining the dose that helped you lose half your body weight continue to result in weight loss? It seems nuts that your provider thinks you need to continue that dose?
Did you change your overall eating and fitness habits while you were losing? If so, I'm not sure why you would need the meds to maintain unless your metabolism is messed up to the point where you need to only eat 1000 calories (I'm larger than you at 5'4 and 120, but I can maintain this weight at 2000 calories)