Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering at the posters who insist that the remodel is really well done. If you want to argue that the materials are high quality, fine, I can't tell. But the design isn't just from a different era, it's fighting with the original architecture. It's what bugged me about the Joanna Gaines show.
The original architecture is all but gone and dwarfed by the expansion at any rate. I think you and most posters are objecting to the new exterior architecture not matching, stylistically, the interior. Which I get. But the reason you can think that is they built basically a new house but made sure that all of the new sections, from the outside, totally worked with the character of the neighborhood and even the small lot.
They did such a good job, you all are believing this is an old house with a new interior. But it’s not.
I’m totally guessing, I don’t know if it was this Sears house. But this would match the right side living room and maybe inspire the new roof? The point is, it’s half the size. I don’t think there are any Sears houses resembling the new house. It’s all new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering at the posters who insist that the remodel is really well done. If you want to argue that the materials are high quality, fine, I can't tell. But the design isn't just from a different era, it's fighting with the original architecture. It's what bugged me about the Joanna Gaines show.
Yes, it's fighting itself within the inside. The moldings are different/inconsistent. They can't decide between straight lines and curves. The colors are all over the place. They wanted to be modern but didn't go all the way modern. The radiators are also confusing in this context.
Anonymous wrote:Obviously it wasn't renovated all at once and probably not even by the same owners. The kitchen is old. The stairs are new.
Anonymous wrote:The inside and outside do not match. The outside calls for a classic, timeless look. Not whatever that modern-ish monstrosity is. Ick.
Anonymous wrote:Does the price history say that it was sold in 2021 for $390,000? I am confused.
Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering at the posters who insist that the remodel is really well done. If you want to argue that the materials are high quality, fine, I can't tell. But the design isn't just from a different era, it's fighting with the original architecture. It's what bugged me about the Joanna Gaines show.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering at the posters who insist that the remodel is really well done. If you want to argue that the materials are high quality, fine, I can't tell. But the design isn't just from a different era, it's fighting with the original architecture. It's what bugged me about the Joanna Gaines show.
The original architecture is all but gone and dwarfed by the expansion at any rate. I think you and most posters are objecting to the new exterior architecture not matching, stylistically, the interior. Which I get. But the reason you can think that is they built basically a new house but made sure that all of the new sections, from the outside, totally worked with the character of the neighborhood and even the small lot.
They did such a good job, you all are believing this is an old house with a new interior. But it’s not.
Anonymous wrote:I'm wondering at the posters who insist that the remodel is really well done. If you want to argue that the materials are high quality, fine, I can't tell. But the design isn't just from a different era, it's fighting with the original architecture. It's what bugged me about the Joanna Gaines show.
Anonymous wrote:Old holes are trash they did the best they could to update it to livable condition