Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter whether AI will replace workers or not. Capital owners are not the red cross. If one day AI is able to replace workers you damn right they will adopt it. They do not care about you and your family. They care about their own bottom line. It's as simple as that.
Bingo. My very first out of college, I worked for a junior developer at one of the well known large bank. One of the Director (not my boss, but my boss reports to him), told me that they hired me so I could automate some of their processes so they can cut the team in half. And this exchange what happened. We hired a consultant which whom I worked. 18 months later the team was cut in 1/2 permanently.
This trend of doing more with less people is not going to slow down and this what people should worry about not AI directly.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter whether AI will replace workers or not. Capital owners are not the red cross. If one day AI is able to replace workers you damn right they will adopt it. They do not care about you and your family. They care about their own bottom line. It's as simple as that.
Anonymous wrote:Microsoft and Indeed just laid off 1000s of people this week blaming AI...and people are still saying don't worry about AI. Um, ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Microsoft and Indeed just laid off 1000s of people this week blaming AI...and people are still saying don't worry about AI. Um, ok.
It’s a smoke screen for offshoring.
Anonymous wrote:Microsoft and Indeed just laid off 1000s of people this week blaming AI...and people are still saying don't worry about AI. Um, ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Microsoft and Indeed just laid off 1000s of people this week blaming AI...and people are still saying don't worry about AI. Um, ok.
And 1000s of farm and field workers have been rounded up at detention centers or deported.
Nobody likes it, but we aren't running around screaming and bleeding from our eyeballs. Guess what? We don't work for Microsoft or Indeed in those jobs.
So again, as has been asked MANY times in this thread -- what level of reaction would be satisfying to you, and why?
Anonymous wrote:Why are some people here downplaying AI' potential impact on the job market.
Anonymous wrote:Microsoft and Indeed just laid off 1000s of people this week blaming AI...and people are still saying don't worry about AI. Um, ok.
Anonymous wrote:IDK. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. While AI can help a worker be efficient, I don't think we are at the point yet where it can replace the worker entirely, except for some basic entry level work.
But, like I said, if AI replaces entry level workers, who will replace midlevel workers once the older workers retire?
https://www.npr.org/2025/07/09/nx-s1-5462609/grok-elon-musk-antisemitic-racist-content
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work in IT at a well-known law firm, and the law firm is going into AI 100%. It launched a Proof of Concept last year using AI to reduce the number of junior lawyers in the firm. The POC went so well that the firm recently laid off over 50% of the junior lawyers on staff. The speed of AI in the next two years will be much more damaging than people think. All of us should be worried.
So there won't be enough mid or senior level lawyers to fix things when it really messes up right?