Anonymous wrote:WASP are not top 10. Get real. SLACs are not even considered by most families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."
We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.
So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?
Here are the top ten according to USNWR: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities?_sort=rank&_sortDirection=asc
So, they add in Duke, Northwestern, U of Chicago into the Top 10.
Anonymous wrote:It is also a stretch to call Cal Tech a national university; it has 2400 students, including grad students, and in that sense has more in common with Harvey Mudd than any of the schools on the list (Harvey Mudd being yet another top 20 or top 25 candidate).
Anonymous wrote:Not all ivys are T10 only. Dartmouth, Cornell, Brown are not T10.
Stanford
Harvard
MIT
Princeton
Yale
Upenn
Duke
UCHICAGO
Johns Hopkins
Columbia
Anonymous wrote:Not all ivys are T10 only. Dartmouth, Cornell, Brown are not T10.
Stanford
Harvard
MIT
Princeton
Yale
Upenn
Duke
UCHICAGO
Johns Hopkins
Columbia
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We all know which schools are included in "Ivy."
We all know what schools are included in HYPMS.
So what are the maybe 2-3 schools not included in either of the above - if any? Cal Tech? What does T-10 even mean?
Here are the top ten according to USNWR: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities?_sort=rank&_sortDirection=asc
So, they add in Duke, Northwestern, U of Chicago into the Top 10.
Anonymous wrote:HYPSM
Penn, Columbia, Brown, Duke, Caltech
No idea why people are discussing Rice, Williams, or Chicago
Anonymous wrote:If Engineering, which is it's own island when it comes to prestige in it's field and subsequently jobs and $$$. The list is very different. Engineering is unique that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM
Penn, Columbia, Brown, Duke, Caltech
No idea why people are discussing Rice, Williams, or Chicago
Chicago makes perfect sense. It is a highly cerebral place with awesome post grad success. Definitely deserves to be in the conversation. Rice is forgettable, and Williams? not even sure I know where or what it is.
Chicago is a good school. Certainly T25 or maybe T20. But T10? No. It's just not that selective. As PP pointed out, the ED0/1/2 and artificially high yield put it out of the running.
Anonymous wrote:OP: no disrespect but LACs belong in a different grouping. I was thinking national universities.
It seems the only non-Ivy, non-HYPMS T-10 suggestions that don't elicit an immediate rebuke are CalTech and Duke.
I think a lot of people would like to believe maybe 10 other universities are also T-10.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivies, Stanford, MIT, Hopkins, Chicago, Rice, Vanderbilt, NW, Amherst, Williams all are contenders for T10.
Vanderbilt? Rice? C'mon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HYPSM
Penn, Columbia, Brown, Duke, Caltech
No idea why people are discussing Rice, Williams, or Chicago
Chicago makes perfect sense. It is a highly cerebral place with awesome post grad success. Definitely deserves to be in the conversation. Rice is forgettable, and Williams? not even sure I know where or what it is.