Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM, where people don’t know the difference between residential and suburban.
I’m glad you like Upper NW but it’s the suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM, where people don’t know the difference between residential and suburban.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the past GW has had the reputation of being for wealthy kids and having a large Jewish and international student population. It is also recognized as a feeder school for Capitol Hill. Our DC area private sends GW one or two students a year.
Our school sends kids to AU, but less reliably. I think an NYC private school kid would feel comfortable at either.
I get the impression that the schools are quite different. That being said, I think there is a fair amount of overlap because of the size of the student body, location and acceptance rate.
GW buildings are mixed into the city (Foggy Bottom) whereas AU has a more traditional campus.
A major benefit of coming to DC is the nice weather (relative to the other areas you are looking at)!
You should definitely come for a visit!
The nice weather compared to Philly?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.
Upper Caucasia in Washington has walk scores lower than many suburbs. The neighborhoods there absolutely ARE suburbs. They weren’t even part of the city’s original historical plan.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like an army of one with a house in the 'burbs (but a DC zip code) roaring that you live in THE CITYAnonymous wrote:Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like an army of one with a house in the 'burbs (but a DC zip code) roaring that you live in THE CITYAnonymous wrote:Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Similar kids, different preferences: GW is urban, AU is suburban.
I'd add to clarify that AU is suburban but a quick metro ride to urban so
You sound like an army of one with a house in the 'burbs (but a DC zip code) roaring that you live in THE CITYAnonymous wrote:Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.
I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.
I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.
I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.
Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.
I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.
This is what Standard and Poors said about Syracuse University last month, as it changed SU's bonk outlook to "negative":
"The revision to negative outlook reflects the sizable growth in debt and weaker financial
resource ratios especially relative to pro forma debt. Further deterioration of resources may
result in a lower rating. The revision also reflects our view of the weaker demand metrics when
compared with rating category medians and similarly rated peers."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a parent of a college freshman. My husband went to Georgetown for grad school and we lived in DC suburbs for 8 years. We are Pitt undergrads.
I agree with the upthread characterizations of GW vs. AU. They both used to be more hometown schools for DMV kids...but provide access into the DC job market. There are many professions where that applies...pre-law, politics, and int'l relations among them.
I don't think either school stands out from the pack of good options. unless Washington is a preferred locale for college or post-college jobs. That might be the case, but it seems your search is still broad.
I would recommend that you also look at Pitt (similar to GW in many ways) and Syracuse while you are looking at GW and American. Simply because I think they check some similar boxes.
Broadly speaking, there is also some DCUM crossover with the University of Rochester and this type of school.
I'm sure American offers a good education but it is currently having some financial issues. That precedes the issues the Trump Administration has caused with all the big R1 universities.
How on earth are Pitt and GWU "similar in many ways?" Cut me a break.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.
Yes, I’m sure. If you live inside Washington DC, then you’re not in a suburb. Those areas certainly have a more residential feel but are still in the city by definition.
Anonymous wrote:You sure? I've always understood a suburb to be a residential area on the outskirts of a city, regardless of which side of some arbitrary municipal boundary it falls on. Many (such as Friendship Heights, right next to AU Park, or Chevy Chase, right next to that) fall on both sides of such boundaries. Does Chevy Chase cease to be a suburb when you cross Western Avenue? If so, your formalistic definition is totally divorced from the practical reality of the people living there (on both sides of the municipal line).Anonymous wrote:Ward 3 (where AU is located) is part of Washington DC. It’s not a separate suburb, which some seem to be suggesting. It’s a residential area in the city. Suburbs by definition are districts outside of a city.