Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Let me translate this for you: UVA wanted more people with actual potential, and fewer people whose daddies bought them the very best schools, the very best test prep, and the very best essay writers their money could buy. Maybe someone who worked a real job, because mom needed help with the bills that summer, instead of a summer “internship” in daddy’s golf buddy’s investment firm. People who can actually contribute and benefit from a rigorous market place ideas instead of get blackout drunk at the frat house every weekend.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Why have that when you can have same, unfair, and exclusionary? Why, I’d never get that.

Just because we're white, don't assume we're doing all of the above using $ we shake from a tree in the backyard.

Anonymous wrote:Basically, people like this

https://www.reddit.com/r/UVA/comments/tbccgp/former_uva_student_named_new_ceo_of_fed_ex/

Wow, talk about bought by daddy.

Basically, people like this

https://www.reddit.com/r/UVA/comments/tbccgp/former_uva_student_named_new_ceo_of_fed_ex/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Let me translate this for you: UVA wanted more people with actual potential, and fewer people whose daddies bought them the very best schools, the very best test prep, and the very best essay writers their money could buy. Maybe someone who worked a real job, because mom needed help with the bills that summer, instead of a summer “internship” in daddy’s golf buddy’s investment firm. People who can actually contribute and benefit from a rigorous market place ideas instead of get blackout drunk at the frat house every weekend.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Why have that when you can have same, unfair, and exclusionary? Why, I’d never get that.

Bless your heart. You win a gold medal in the victim Olympics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Let me translate this for you: UVA wanted more people with actual potential, and fewer people whose daddies bought them the very best schools, the very best test prep, and the very best essay writers their money could buy. Maybe someone who worked a real job, because mom needed help with the bills that summer, instead of a summer “internship” in daddy’s golf buddy’s investment firm. People who can actually contribute and benefit from a rigorous market place ideas instead of get blackout drunk at the frat house every weekend.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Why have that when you can have same, unfair, and exclusionary? Why, I’d never get that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mediocre white students, especially males, hate being around excellence.

Huh? How does giving a boost to someone purely because of the color of their skin make them "excellent"? Removing DEI means that no one gets in based on their race, but ONLY due to their qualifications. Of course, Democrats are dead set against merit ONLY admissions. Makes sense.

People, people! How many times does this have to be explained?! White women have statistically been the biggest beneficiaries of DEI policies. Yes, shocking and sad. That means that DEI includes everyone in the US except for cis, able-bodied white men.

It was created because that small minority of Americans had (and in most cases) have an outsized representation in all facets of academia, business, government, etc. it was created BECAUSE merit didn’t exist, and we’re seeing with this admin, who cut all the women generals and fired people of color that they hate women and POC and LGBTQ and veterans and people with any kind of disability.

This is petty, vindictive, and an overreach of state’s rights. Stand up or watch your own rights be eroded, unless you are a cis, able bodied white man (and there are fortunately a decent amount of them finally speaking up).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Way to miss the point. I expect no less from a mediocre white male born on third base thinking he hit a triple.

Hmm. I'm a woman. And you seem very confused about exactly what the point is. But glad we've confirmed you actually advocate for discrimination based on race.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Way to miss the point. I expect no less from a mediocre white male born on third base thinking he hit a triple.

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

+100
I find it so interesting that the Democrats who are outraged about this are effectively saying, "We want certain people to be discriminated against and other people to be treated more favorably - and all based on their race." Not that we didn't already know this, but wow - it's something to see them actually confirm this.

Good riddance.

Thank you, Trump.

Anonymous wrote:This country is going down the tubes and fast.

By treating everyone equally? Yes, so horrible!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From trump because of DEI. Bastards! Why do they hate this much?

https://apnews.com/article/university-of-virginia-dei-james-ryan-6f8cfc43738944ca8164ab20814c5695

Because its a violation of our civil rights laws. Omg, why can't you guys get it? We arent going to make it legal to discriminate against white people and Asians. Okay? Give it up.

Its because of discrimination and the abundance of medicore white guys that making the process fair was needed. But I guess MAGA wants to return to the days when people like JD Vance and Clarence Thomas would never be accepted to elite universities.

If white men have an average SAT score and GPA that is higher than black men, but the white men are “mediocre white guys” in your mind, then what does that make black men? Logically it’s not good.

A higher SAT average doesn't make the white men any smarter, or worthier to attend these institutions than the POCs who have the brains but no access to the resources (legacy being one of the resources) those "mediocre white guys" are born into.

As for us Asians, the revenge of the mediocre white guys is just a matter of time.

DP. You're aware that UVA (and most other schools) have done away with legacy admissions too, right? Why are you against merit-based admissions?