Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.
Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.
Same with 2A. Let it rip then.
Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.
Anonymous wrote:We are officially a fascist dictatorship. Look at Hungary. Viktor Orban followed the exact same playbook. First, take over the Supreme Court. Check. Then attack the news media. Check. Then the lawyers, intellectuals, teachers, universities, check, check, check, check.
This is unconstitutional, and yet the SCOTUS decides it can write us a new constitution.
This is grim, indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?
Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor..
I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.
Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland
Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!
No mas anchor bebes?!
Uh oh. Who’s gonna tell Barron, Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric?
Educated literate ones don’t count. Net positive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?
You see, birthright citizen ship is written into the United States Constitution.
If
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.
Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.
Same with 2A. Let it rip then.
Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.
Good luck! LOL
Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.
Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.
Same with 2A. Let it rip then.
Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.
Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.
Same with 2A. Let it rip then.
Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland
Anonymous wrote:They didn’t actually rule on the content of the executive order. It was more that they ruled that District courts couldn’t make national injunctions. So, everyone one has to file their own lawsuit. If the administration chooses not to fight on appeal if they lose, that one person gets citizenship. As a result, everyone born in U.S. with an undocumented person as their mother will have to sue for citizenship. If they don’t sue, they don’t get it. At least, that is my understanding. I’ll be happy to hear other opinions. Nice way to clog up the courts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?
Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor.. I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.
Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?
Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor.. I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.
Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with