Anonymous wrote:It's so nasty and rude to criticize other people for how they dress and how they look. You will never come to Wintour's ankle in terms of professional career and general competency, but you certainly match her reputed cruelty.

Let's see how you dress, OP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. She’s best friends with Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Georgina Chapman, and Anna Wintour’s daughter? What?

It's not really surprising she's friends with those women -- they all live in NY and are in similar social and charitable circles. Huma has always been a fashion girl and it's zero surprise she's friendly with Anna Wintour, and thus Bee Schaffer (Anna's daughter), as well as designers like Chapman, Prabal Gurung, Tori Burch, etc. (who were also all at the wedding). Huma and her husband met at a party thrown by Nicky Hilton (who was also there and also part of this same cohort). Do you really think its' weird that people with similar interests and taste, who live and vacation in the same places and go to the same parties, might know each other and be friends?

Also, it doesn't say she's "best friends" with any of them. Vogue of course featured photos of the famous and fashion-adjacent people at the wedding. These aren't her personal wedding photos. These are the photos of the event that Vogue chose to feature, highlighting the people and aspects of the wedding that would be of the most interest to Vogue readers. Notice there is exactly one photo of Huma's sister, who was her maid of honor, and the just one photo of the bridesmaids in order to feature their designer dresses, but their names aren't even listed. I suspect Huma spent more of the day with those women than she did with Jennifer Lawrence or Tori Burch, just as any bride does.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. She’s best friends with Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Georgina Chapman, and Anna Wintour’s daughter? What?

You have to be famous to be friends with Huma Abedin.
No mention of Chelsea Clinton at the wedding.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. She’s best friends with Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Georgina Chapman, and Anna Wintour’s daughter? What?

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. She’s best friends with Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Georgina Chapman, and Anna Wintour’s daughter? What?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were going to elope and Hillary convinced her to have a ceremony with friends. Perhaps that is one reason it was understated. I thought it looked lovely.

For the PP who said her family wasn’t there, one of the pictures shows her with her sister and nephews and another shows her niece as a bridesmaid.

Do you know how many people are in the Bride’s side at a South Asian wedding? At barest of bare minimum 60 people. If your aunts, uncles and cousins are not at your wedding it is very, very weird. It’s clear she is more Meghan Markle than Lauren Sanchez.

It's a second wedding, she's 50 years old, she and her husband paid for this wedding and hosted it at their home. It's clear she had a lot of family there, but she's not 30 years old and marrying someone for the first time and her parents spending all their savings on a big wedding so that all the aunts and uncles and cousins can fly in from India or Pakistan and elsewhere to attend. She has been an adult for 30 years and has a broad array of friends and colleagues and that is who she wanted to have at her wedding, not distant relatives. But it's also clear her mother, sister, nieces and nephews were a big part of the wedding.

Also, they had a small ceremony before the wedding where they signed the marriage contracts under their respective religious traditions (Muslim and Jewish) and that had a smaller guest list of just family and very close friends. The photos of that event are not in Vogue, likely because it was much more private and intimate.

So no, actually not weird. It would be weirder for a 50 year old bride to recreate the wedding of a much younger person.

I have ZERO idea what Meghan Markle or Lauren Sanchez have to do with it other than them also being famous women who got married? I don't think Huma is similar to either of them, frankly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were going to elope and Hillary convinced her to have a ceremony with friends. Perhaps that is one reason it was understated. I thought it looked lovely.

For the PP who said her family wasn’t there, one of the pictures shows her with her sister and nephews and another shows her niece as a bridesmaid.

Do you know how many people are in the Bride’s side at a South Asian wedding? At barest of bare minimum 60 people. If your aunts, uncles and cousins are not at your wedding it is very, very weird. It’s clear she is more Meghan Markle than Lauren Sanchez.

Anonymous wrote:They were going to elope and Hillary convinced her to have a ceremony with friends. Perhaps that is one reason it was understated. I thought it looked lovely.

For the PP who said her family wasn’t there, one of the pictures shows her with her sister and nephews and another shows her niece as a bridesmaid.

Anonymous wrote:Imagine picking at a bride in a wedding gown.

Too thin, too fat, too old, look at her neck, veins, skin, too much skin, too dowdy, I can’t believe she’s wearing white, blah blah blah.

Do better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG learn to embed photos or stay off beauty and fashion (and entertainment) . You know who you are.

Why when all the photos are right there in the story?