Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just heard an interesting, important strategy, especially for LA and this weekend. Carry US flags only. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Because cops attacking people carrying US flags will help the narrative truth that they’re attacking Americans.

Pass it on.

It’s the military!! They are supposed to be DEFENDING Americans. And they’re being sent to attack US CITIZENS? They have no authority to be there!

We’ll carry the US flag for insurance and optics.

Anonymous wrote:Just heard an interesting, important strategy, especially for LA and this weekend. Carry US flags only. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Because cops attacking people carrying US flags will help the narrative truth that they’re attacking Americans.

Pass it on.

It’s the military!! They are supposed to be DEFENDING Americans. And they’re being sent to attack US CITIZENS? They have no authority to be there!

Anonymous wrote:This will not end well for Trump. He's misread what people want. I know the MAGA on here will disagree but he's way over his skis on this.

Apparently, people want Democrats to have a veto on which federal laws get enforced.

Just heard an interesting, important strategy, especially for LA and this weekend. Carry US flags only. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Because cops attacking people carrying US flags will help the narrative truth that they’re attacking Americans.

Pass it on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will not end well for Trump. He's misread what people want. I know the MAGA on here will disagree but he's way over his skis on this.

I think this is the beginning of the end too. Several people saying he’ll be gone by the end of year, for legal reasons (like forced out, not impeached) and/or health issues.

The Biden Rule allows a president to be a zombie for his entire term.

Anonymous wrote:I’m so happy no one posting here lives in LA… I look forward to what happens when all this boot licking garbage lands on your respective doorsteps.

Will you stay on your knees to comply or will you stand. Only time will tell…

You could fly to LA and throw things at cops. I’m sure people here would pay for your ticket.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Seriously. All those red state county Sheriffs know exactly where to find undocumented workers, but they give them sanctuary.

Yet we never hear the phrase "sanctuary farms".

This.

+1 very good comment. ICE knows where to go but alas, someone’s gotta pick the fruits and vegetables and there just aren’t enough laid off federal workers ready to pick up the slack (give it another year).

Farm workers are true migrants by definition, they come and go with the picking season. They are not setting up permanent residence in cities, which is what this directed at. Even so, I do believe some get temporary work authorization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They specifically say they can detain but not arrest people. Whatever that means.

Marines to accompany ICE on raids! It looks like the marines will be kicking down door in Los Angeles just like they did in Fallujah. I guess the US military will never be able to say they protect our freedoms.

You already hate the military. If you hate them more does it matter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Seriously. All those red state county Sheriffs know exactly where to find undocumented workers, but they give them sanctuary.

Yet we never hear the phrase "sanctuary farms".

This.

+1 very good comment. ICE knows where to go but alas, someone’s gotta pick the fruits and vegetables and there just aren’t enough laid off federal workers ready to pick up the slack (give it another year).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Note to all sanctuary cities when ICE shoes up to do its job, FAFO.

What about the sanctuary farms?

The undocumented migrants working illegally are on the farms. Go get um, ICE! That's the real low hanging fruit. Go get um, if you dare upset your hypocritical supporters.

They can't because they are serving the rich people, and this government is all about giving the resources to the rich.

Seriously. All those red state county Sheriffs know exactly where to find undocumented workers, but they give them sanctuary.

Yet we never hear the phrase "sanctuary farms".

This.

Anonymous wrote:This will not end well for Trump. He's misread what people want. I know the MAGA on here will disagree but he's way over his skis on this.

I think this is the beginning of the end too. Several people saying he’ll be gone by the end of year, for legal reasons (like forced out, not impeached) and/or health issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They specifically say they can detain but not arrest people. Whatever that means.

If you’re pulled over and a cop is searching your car for guns or drugs, they can put you in handcuffs or the back of their car. That’s being detained, and is for officer safety.

You can be released or arrested, depending on what they find.

Yes, I understand what that means in the context of the police. They can detain someone, in their police car or at the station, without arresting them.

Whar does it mean in the context of the Marines? No idea. And they don't have any idea either.

This will not end well for Trump. He's misread what people want. I know the MAGA on here will disagree but he's way over his skis on this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do not see what the big deal is.
They will protect the ICE agent’s perimeter so a bunch of citizens don’t get all excited and try to interfere in ICE doing their job.

As long as people do not throw rocks at the marines they should not get shot by them.

Throw rocks? I saw two videos of LAPD shoot women with rubber bullets, and one was a journalist just doing her job. These women were doing nothing to warrant being shot. Next time they may not be rubber bullets.

One guy shot a woman in the stomach who was alone and trying to get into her apartment. Where is the outrage? They couldn’t have safely escorted her home? No, because this is about terror and not safety. Otherwise they wouldn’t be detaining pregnant women and high schoolers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They specifically say they can detain but not arrest people. Whatever that means.

If you’re pulled over and a cop is searching your car for guns or drugs, they can put you in handcuffs or the back of their car. That’s being detained, and is for officer safety.

You can be released or arrested, depending on what they find.

Thank you.