Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Takes two seconds to fact check this. No, there weren’t only 1000 people at the capitol on January 6.
From Grok:
About 10,000–12,000 protesters were at or near the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, with 800–2,500 entering the building.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone seem to think there would only be killing by MAGAs? I know plenty of Progressives who would be willing to do some killing. They’re not going to start the war, but once it’s started, they’re all-in.
These people are serious, too. They know Carlos hand to hand fighting disciplines and martial arts, they are experts with knives and edged weapons, they can improvise booby traps. They’d be able to take out MAGAs like they were squishing bugs.
I thought MAGA sees Progressive men as beta men. Do beta men own ar15s and use violence to deal with disagreements?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
Weren't there fewer than 1,000 protesters on J6? How many other protests turned violent that can be called "MAGA" happened? Am scratching head trying to think of them.
How many rioters are in LA right now? How many people rioted in the summer of George Floyd?
That alone tells you how paranoid most of you are about "MAGA" that you can't even see the fatal flaw in your beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:ICE is executing the 'due process will not be followed with regard to immigration' policy of the White House.
So are people saying that those who are combating ICE agents should be bearing arms? Would that be correct? And the rogue, amateur weapons like bricks and Molotov cocktails are not in line with the 2A?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, look at the J6 insurrectionists. That was very very tame in comparison, but it showed that dictator Trump would not stop any violence in his name. I truly think many MAGA want a Gilead.
I’ll be posting a slap in your face exchange between a White House reporter and your Führer.Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
It's ICE. And we have Stephen Miller screaming at ICE to meet quotas because MAGA voted in TACO again.
ICE is not burning cars and throwing rocks and bricks and looting businesses and throwing Molotov cocktails and destroying buildings.
Anonymous wrote:Good grief. This thread is over the top.
Just an observation - it is NOT the MAGA types causing mayhem in LA or NY or Dallas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since Trump constantly talks or tweets about “radical left-wing lunatics” who “want to destroy this country,” he is practically putting a bullseye on Democrats. He also bad mouths Blue states constantly, further adding fuel to the fire. I mean, it’s not Rwanda yet, but he is constantly and actively stoking hatred for non-Maga in his followers in a way that exacerbates political tensions. Who knows what will happen with another 3 1/2 years of this. He never shuts up.
This kind of one-sided analysis is stupid. Tell the truth about the rhetoric and dog whistles on both sides. Your safety literally depends on it. Unless enough people on both sides reestablish the norm that no one gets to incite, justify, or commit violence for any reason, this country is toast. Take it from an immigrant.
There’s no both siding this one, I’m afraid. The literal volume of hateful, divisive speech that emanates from his mouth or his social media on a daily basis far outweighs anything on the other side.
Exhibit 1. Why not just say “I disagree with Governor Newsom” like a normal president? Why go right to calling him Governor Newscum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is stupid.
Everyone should get a gun anyway because it is your right.
Get a gun for what exactly?
NRA said it's to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone seem to think there would only be killing by MAGAs? I know plenty of Progressives who would be willing to do some killing. They’re not going to start the war, but once it’s started, they’re all-in.
These people are serious, too. They know Carlos hand to hand fighting disciplines and martial arts, they are experts with knives and edged weapons, they can improvise booby traps. They’d be able to take out MAGAs like they were squishing bugs.
Don't kid yourself. These "progressives" who love to use political issues as an excuse to mix it up with the police and throw Molotov cocktails could easily start a war. Democrats are putting the whole country at risk justifying such behavior.
progressives are usually kumbaya type people. The people who throw molotov cocktails are anarchists and use any excuse to be violent.
Yes, and Democrats have been giving them political and media cover for a long time because SO FAR, their violence is directed at the Democrats' enemies. Americans refuse to learn from the countless examples in history of how easy it is to lose control of violent groups.
Right, and who was it who stormed the capital and killed police officers?
That was MAGA. Which side's protesters caused violence and arson during the 2020 riots? That was the left. We could play this moronic game all day or you could get your partisan head out of your ass and realize that any large scale act of political violence can be the match that sets this whole country ablaze. Condemn all violence or live to see your luck run out.
Wrong go read the court cases on those riots it wasn’t liberals idiot
Jan 6th was even worse by the way moron.