Anonymous wrote:For perspective on Pomona's difficulty of admission, this site places it as the 16th most selective school in the nation:
https://wallethub.com/edu/e/college-rankings/40750
Anonymous wrote:Accessibility of professors, academic rigor, and commitment to undergraduate teaching. Amherst, Pomona, and Carleton are highly ranked in these areas—hard to beat them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you distinguish between the LACs when they're all similar, especially amongst WASP schools? They all have small class sizes, pretty campuses, and strong academics. DD is interested in a math/history double major, but the schools and offerings are so so similar that it seems like we are just splitting hairs deciding.
I wouldn’t restrict to just those 4 anymore than I would restrict a university list to just HYPMS but…
A few things that come to mind to learn about:
Distribution of majors, courses available, major requirements, grad requirements, feeder rates to different grad programs, region, town, campus features, facilities, traditions, alumni giving, legacy blind, extracurricular scene (including % athlete), research opportunities, faculty interests, access to airport, access to nature, access to major city, expert opinions, financial aid, health services access, faculty compensation, and transparency (eg availability of common data sets.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a statistical perspective on Pomona's history program, Pomona graduated seven first majors in history in a recent year.
https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=Pomona&s=all&id=121345#programs
Sounds like they get a lot of attention if true; they have 10 tenure/tenure track faculty alone. Add CMC’s 14 tenure/tenure track history faculty and you have access to a very large pool of resources.
Anonymous wrote:For a statistical perspective on Pomona's history program, Pomona graduated seven first majors in history in a recent year.
https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=Pomona&s=all&id=121345#programs
Anonymous wrote:Accessibility of professors, academic rigor, and commitment to undergraduate teaching. Amherst, Pomona, and Carleton are highly ranked in these areas—hard to beat them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you distinguish between the LACs when they're all similar, especially amongst WASP schools? They all have small class sizes, pretty campuses, and strong academics. DD is interested in a math/history double major, but the schools and offerings are so so similar that it seems like we are just splitting hairs deciding.
Easzee Peaszee: Among Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, & Pomona, you distinguish by which one(s) accepted you and those which rejected you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It “a” LAC, not “an” LAC.
I've always pronounced it "Lack" in my head, ie, treated it as an acronym, not an initialism like ATM.
Exactly. No one says their kid goes to an "el ay cee".
Actually,most do.
Correct.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It “a” LAC, not “an” LAC.
I've always pronounced it "Lack" in my head, ie, treated it as an acronym, not an initialism like ATM.
Exactly. No one says their kid goes to an "el ay cee".
Actually,most do.
Anonymous wrote:How do you distinguish between the LACs when they're all similar, especially amongst WASP schools? They all have small class sizes, pretty campuses, and strong academics. DD is interested in a math/history double major, but the schools and offerings are so so similar that it seems like we are just splitting hairs deciding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It “a” LAC, not “an” LAC.
I've always pronounced it "Lack" in my head, ie, treated it as an acronym, not an initialism like ATM.
Exactly. No one says their kid goes to an "el ay cee".