Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t you mean why do *SOME kids prefer urban campuses? Ours didn’t. They grew up here and wanted a totally different experience.
Like middle of nowhere small town experience?
For some, yes.
It's not an exact science.
We are talking in general.
Yes, in general, some people like the city and some people like the country.
In general, kids like urban setting.
Most applied private schools in the US are NYU, Northeastern, Boston Univ, USC. They are all in cities. Location helped the popularity of these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t you mean why do *SOME kids prefer urban campuses? Ours didn’t. They grew up here and wanted a totally different experience.
Like middle of nowhere small town experience?
DP. That’s exactly what mine want. Quintessential small college town, traditional pretty campus, etc. As someone who went to a school in the city which had no campus to speak of, I wish I had done the same.
traditional pretty campus doesn't equal to middle of nowhere
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mine have both. Defined pretty, leafy campus right next to small city and 40 min to a major city.
+100
The first two years kids really socialize more around the campus and then the last two years they are out in the city more often
Anonymous wrote:Why do kids want to go to school in a city?
Anonymous wrote:Not all urban areas. Look at how popular USC has become. Record applications. Same with UMiami, Villanova, Georgetown, Johns Hopkins, NYU the Boston schools (I think being in Boston has allowed BC, BU and NEU is one of the biggest reasons they have all become wildly popular).
So it is the U.S.'s first tier cities that have become such a major draw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do kids want to go to school in a city?
You mean, *some* kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other potentially appealing part of urban settings not as available in smaller towns/suburbs is having another large pool of young people in their early 20s for social opportunities (dating or otherwise).
Tbh, I would feel better about my kid meeting students on campus than older randos in city bars or on Tinder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other potentially appealing part of urban settings not as available in smaller towns/suburbs is having another large pool of young people in their early 20s for social opportunities (dating or otherwise).
Tbh, I would feel better about my kid meeting students on campus than older randos in city bars or on Tinder.
Anonymous wrote:Because they hear other kids say it. Honestly, how much are these kids really taking advantage of being in a city? It's a stupid trend.
Anonymous wrote:The other potentially appealing part of urban settings not as available in smaller towns/suburbs is having another large pool of young people in their early 20s for social opportunities (dating or otherwise).