Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Oh really? Yet somehow India has killed more than 100,000 Kashmiri civilians

Cite?

Anonymous wrote:Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Pakistan admits it was just doing the dirty work of the US government for the past 3 decades. No surprise given the US and it's long history of outsourcing terrorism

https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/1915547701644763166

Pakistan is the epicenter of terrorism

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Oh really? Yet somehow India has killed more than 100,000 Kashmiri civilians

So, a new war has started under Trump.

Huh? The NY Times had it as their front page online since yesterday evening. Everyone is covering the conflict.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Pakistan is the one supporting terrorism.

Anonymous wrote:In India, the real danger is in how this will be used to wipe out any remaining govt oppositions under the guise of national security. Sound familiar?

Not likely. There are like 1200 parties, and they have all managed to survive through all the various terrorist attacks over the decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

I do understand the grievances by the Baloch people, but that should not have happened.

"At a news conference in Islamabad on Friday, army spokesperson Lt Gen Ahmad Sharif said “in this terrorist incident in Balochistan, and others before, the main sponsor is your eastern neighbour,” referring to India.

He offered no proof to support the accusation, which has been rejected by India."

"Earlier, Pakistan’s foreign ministry had claimed the train attack was orchestrated from Afghanistan, where the attackers had been in contact with handlers. Kabul denied the accusation and said the BLA had no presence there."

It's internally inconsistent for India to support the BLA, AND work with the Afghans to orchestrate the attack.

In India, the real danger is in how this will be used to wipe out any remaining govt oppositions under the guise of national security. Sound familiar?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

People should read up on the type of terrorism and violence the Indian army has been perpetrating on the local population of Kashmir for decades

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

So was the Kashmir attack.

The question was not whether the Kashmir attack was ok. It was how is this appropriate?

Unless you think crazy and dangerous attacks are appropriate?

It is an officially declared attack within the non disputed borders of Pakistan by the Indian military.

Countries have a right to self-defense. If nothing was done in response, attacks on India would continue.

India has been supporting terrorist attacks in Pakistan in the west of the country, in KP and Balochistan.

Do tell. Which attacks have happened in KP and Balochistan ahead of the killing of the tourists, and which Indian terrorist groups are responsible for them.

They are not Indian terrorists, but India does provide support for terrorist separatist groups in Pakistan.

India supports the BLA, which is designated a terrorist group by the US. In March the BLA hijacked a civilian train in Pakistan and killed 26 passengers.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/14/pakistan-accuses-india-of-sponsoring-militant-terror-group-after-train-hijacking

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nuclear war, that is.

Sure - they’ve been “on the brink” forever, but recent escalations are far more serious.

Why the news blackout? Even BBC is not covering the war.

It's the top story on Google and CNN right now, dingbat.

+1 I got two different notifications about this today, from CNN and the WSJ at about 5 pm eastern.

And still no mention on Fox News.

PP is a moron.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/pakistan-calls-indias-strikes-act-war-claims-shot-down-indian-fighter-jets

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks this is an appropriate response to the Kashmir attack?

How do you think this is appropriate?

This is crazy. And dangerous.

1) Pakistan has a long history of being a safe haven for terrorists.

2) Slaughtering tourists is not okay.

Killing civilians in a mosque is also not okay.

FAFO

Exactly. I admire India for not rolling over.

Agreed. Pakistan is a haven for terrorists (Bin Laden was found in Pakistan).!

This is true.

The Taliban and ISI are one-in-the-same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nuclear war, that is.

Sure - they’ve been “on the brink” forever, but recent escalations are far more serious.

Why the news blackout? Even BBC is not covering the war.

It's the top story on Google and CNN right now, dingbat.

+1 I got two different notifications about this today, from CNN and the WSJ at about 5 pm eastern.

And still no mention on Fox News.