Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.

Actually it is all about right vs left. If he was a trumpist no republican would call for him to step down or not run again.

The Republicans specialize in running dementia patients and social rejects for public office. Dems usually hold themselves to a higher standard. Fetterman isn’t the same anymore, and that’s a real shame. I wouldn’t say it’s a bait and switch because no one can help a stroke or what comes after, but if this is what he is now, Pennsylvia Dems are right to be looking for a more effective alternative to better represent their interests.

Sigh. There are so many examples of Democratic politicians who should have retired or never run at all due to mental degradation. They were controlled by their staffs and did the bidding of the party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I loved Fetterman back when - but I heard him interviewed on The Bulwark a couple of months ago and gd it was a tough listen. He couldn't stay on topic, rambled all over - just, it was painful.

Here's a video of it - I listened, didn't watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mefVUdAlX4

I hope he does the right thing and moves aside for someone else to run.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.

Actually it is all about right vs left. If he was a trumpist no republican would call for him to step down or not run again.

The Republicans specialize in running dementia patients and social rejects for public office. Dems usually hold themselves to a higher standard. Fetterman isn’t the same anymore, and that’s a real shame. I wouldn’t say it’s a bait and switch because no one can help a stroke or what comes after, but if this is what he is now, Pennsylvia Dems are right to be looking for a more effective alternative to better represent their interests.

Anonymous wrote:The sudden coordination of these attacks is highly suspicious I must say.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The sudden coordination of these attacks is highly suspicious I must say.

In that he doesn’t represent his electorate anymore? I guess that was kind of sudden, and that is part of what is concerning.

We care about that kind of stuff, but it’s nothing like the MAGAs. If a Republican politician dares to point out that Trump is wrong, out come the torches and pitchforks.

Say what you want about the Democrats, but we aren’t terrorists like the MAGAs.

There's a solution to this problem. It's called an election. If Fetterman doesn't represent his constituents anymore, they will vote him out. However, it's quite possible that a Republican could replace Fetterman, so maybe keeping him would be preferable?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The sudden coordination of these attacks is highly suspicious I must say.

In that he doesn’t represent his electorate anymore? I guess that was kind of sudden, and that is part of what is concerning.

We care about that kind of stuff, but it’s nothing like the MAGAs. If a Republican politician dares to point out that Trump is wrong, out come the torches and pitchforks.

Say what you want about the Democrats, but we aren’t terrorists like the MAGAs.

Anonymous wrote:The sudden coordination of these attacks is highly suspicious I must say.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.

Actually it is all about right vs left. If he was a trumpist no republican would call for him to step down or not run again.

The Republicans specialize in running dementia patients and social rejects for public office. Dems usually hold themselves to a higher standard. Fetterman isn’t the same anymore, and that’s a real shame. I wouldn’t say it’s a bait and switch because no one can help a stroke or what comes after, but if this is what he is now, Pennsylvia Dems are right to be looking for a more effective alternative to better represent their interests.

Sigh. There are so many examples of Democratic politicians who should have retired or never run at all due to mental degradation. They were controlled by their staffs and did the bidding of the party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.

Actually it is all about right vs left. If he was a trumpist no republican would call for him to step down or not run again.

The Republicans specialize in running dementia patients and social rejects for public office. Dems usually hold themselves to a higher standard. Fetterman isn’t the same anymore, and that’s a real shame. I wouldn’t say it’s a bait and switch because no one can help a stroke or what comes after, but if this is what he is now, Pennsylvia Dems are right to be looking for a more effective alternative to better represent their interests.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whore won’t give up the grift without a fight - once they’re bought, they don’t know how to say no to the money, no matter how far into the den of corruption they stumble.

He’ll fight to keep his seat, even if he can’t even string together a coherent sentence without his AIPAC handler putting a card in front of him to read from. Thomas Massie, one of the most intelligent and principled members of Congress, describes it best …

https://youtu.be/x5pSz7A0KhU?feature=shared

That video of Massie describing what AIPAC does was long but eyeopening. Everyone should watch it.

Massie is a literal machinegun-owning MAGA republican from Kentucky. Odd that you bestow such credibility on him. Very weird.

Let’s play your game, then.

What did Massie state in that video that isn’t 100% on-the-money accurate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.

Actually it is all about right vs left. If he was a trumpist no republican would call for him to step down or not run again.

Anonymous wrote:The Bulwark interview!!!
Seriously don’t bother having an option until you take the time to listen to it.
I’ve always liked Fetterman, but that interview was absolutely a deal breaker. He is very obviously cognitively impaired. Pennsylvania needs to make a different choice when his term is up. It’s not about left or right, the guy isn’t well. The state isn’t being served at this time.