Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

Ask the question a little differently. Given what we have seen the last few weeks of plain-clothes/unmarked/unbadged "law enforcement" kidnapping people...how do we know they are domestic law enforcement or foreign mercenaries? Or foreign troops? We have NO idea.

+1 I am NOT ADVOCATING FOR THIS but I’m surprised that in a nation with hundreds of millions of guns that federal law enforcement (ICE and all the others who have been redirected to ICE’s mission) seems to be going about these apprehensions in the most dangerous possible manner. A man who has a concealed carry permit walking down the street with his immigrant wife is not going to react well to masked, badgeless men grabbing her and trying to stuff her in a van.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.
tr
I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

Why would there be consequences for legal, peaceful protests?

LOL because the "king" does not like anyone who does not worship his feet. No critics allowed-lock them up. So glad we are going back to exactly what Americans fought against-monarchy. MAGA are the biggest morons ever.

Yeah, this guy is SO fragile, he can’t even handle the correspondents dinner. It is so bizarre to me that anyone can look at him and see strength. He’s such a weak loser in every way.

The Obama joke at the correspondents dinner is what drove Trump to run the first time.

This dinner is so silly. Who cares.

What matters is that a grown man and leader of the free would should not be so narcissistic and emotionally stunted that his fragile ego can’t have a sense of humor about himself for even one night to raise money for scholarships. Bad leadership. Bad character.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.

I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

Why would there be consequences for legal, peaceful protests?

LOL because the "king" does not like anyone who does not worship his feet. No critics allowed-lock them up. So glad we are going back to exactly what Americans fought against-monarchy. MAGA are the biggest morons ever.

Yeah, this guy is SO fragile, he can’t even handle the correspondents dinner. It is so bizarre to me that anyone can look at him and see strength. He’s such a weak loser in every way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you haven’t noticed that Trump ruins the careers of everyone in his orbit? Appearing to like Trump is a kiss of death in the business world.

Are you saying there is a liberal cancel culture?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you haven’t noticed that Trump ruins the careers of everyone in his orbit? Appearing to like Trump is a kiss of death in the business world.

Are you saying there is a liberal cancel culture?

Anonymous wrote:So you haven’t noticed that Trump ruins the careers of everyone in his orbit? Appearing to like Trump is a kiss of death in the business world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

Ask the question a little differently. Given what we have seen the last few weeks of plain-clothes/unmarked/unbadged "law enforcement" kidnapping people...how do we know they are domestic law enforcement or foreign mercenaries? Or foreign troops? We have NO idea.

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.

I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

For the love of God, stop relying on Chat GPT to explain things to you. It’s crap and it’s what these immature tech bro terrorist Yarvin sociopaths want to do to everything.

I get it, you are scared of automation. Change and progress are hard, but the world is moving on.

Wrong. I use AI at work every day. I know its strengths and weaknesses.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.
tr
I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

Why would there be consequences for legal, peaceful protests?

LOL because the "king" does not like anyone who does not worship his feet. No critics allowed-lock them up. So glad we are going back to exactly what Americans fought against-monarchy. MAGA are the biggest morons ever.

Yeah, this guy is SO fragile, he can’t even handle the correspondents dinner. It is so bizarre to me that anyone can look at him and see strength. He’s such a weak loser in every way.

The Obama joke at the correspondents dinner is what drove Trump to run the first time.

This dinner is so silly. Who cares.

What matters is that a grown man and leader of the free would should not be so narcissistic and emotionally stunted that his fragile ego can’t have a sense of humor about himself for even one night to raise money for scholarships. Bad leadership. Bad character.

Where were all the stars that attended during the Biden Administration? Don't they care about raising money for scholarships?

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.
tr
I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

Why would there be consequences for legal, peaceful protests?

LOL because the "king" does not like anyone who does not worship his feet. No critics allowed-lock them up. So glad we are going back to exactly what Americans fought against-monarchy. MAGA are the biggest morons ever.

Yeah, this guy is SO fragile, he can’t even handle the correspondents dinner. It is so bizarre to me that anyone can look at him and see strength. He’s such a weak loser in every way.

The Obama joke at the correspondents dinner is what drove Trump to run the first time.

This dinner is so silly. Who cares.

What matters is that a grown man and leader of the free would should not be so narcissistic and emotionally stunted that his fragile ego can’t have a sense of humor about himself for even one night to raise money for scholarships. Bad leadership. Bad character.

Anonymous wrote:Tyranny never ends well for the tyrant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the EO and got this back:

This executive order directs the federal government to strongly support state and local police by increasing resources, legal protections, and training, while opposing local policies seen as limiting law enforcement. It calls for legal aid for officers accused in the line of duty, more funding for police pay and prisons, and expanded use of military equipment to fight crime. It also authorizes legal action against local officials who obstruct policing or implement certain diversity and equity policies viewed as harmful. Overall, it emphasizes a law-and-order approach focused on tough policing and public safety.
tr
I'm fine with this executive order. Democrats weakened the police and allowed people to take over cities in the name of social justice and "reparations" (it is just property!), as well as their blatant refusal to prosecute criminals.

I interpret this as a sign that such situations won't be tolerated again, and people should be prepared to face consequences if there are mostly peaceful protests planned for the summer.

Why would there be consequences for legal, peaceful protests?

LOL because the "king" does not like anyone who does not worship his feet. No critics allowed-lock them up. So glad we are going back to exactly what Americans fought against-monarchy. MAGA are the biggest morons ever.

Yeah, this guy is SO fragile, he can’t even handle the correspondents dinner. It is so bizarre to me that anyone can look at him and see strength. He’s such a weak loser in every way.

The Obama joke at the correspondents dinner is what drove Trump to run the first time.

This dinner is so silly. Who cares.