Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What people need is to get him to do some good by hyping and motivating him to address major issues. If he does few stupid things, those can be changed once he is gone. We do need a crazy shaker to fight food and pharma.
Why do we need to fight pharma? The Sackler situation is not typical. Pharma does more good than harm. People repeat this but what do they really mean? I take life-saving meds and so do family members. Thank God for that.
Anonymous wrote:What people need is to get him to do some good by hyping and motivating him to address major issues. If he does few stupid things, those can be changed once he is gone. We do need a crazy shaker to fight food and pharma.
Anonymous wrote:Huh? This doesn’t make any sense and isn’t irony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like MAGAs supported him because they were mad about Government telling them to get vaccinated and mask up....and now he is using Government to tell them they can't eat skittles and M&M's anymore.
Although I guess its sort of like people voting for Trump because they were mad the price of eggs went up, and so now the price of everything will go up.
He's a Kennedy, so people either like them or don't. He seems genuine and a good guy overall about wanting to help clean up the food that corporations and foreign sources have polluted.
Why on Earth are you against that?
He is not qualified or a good guy. Wtf.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What people need is to get him to do some good by hyping and motivating him to address major issues. If he does few stupid things, those can be changed once he is gone. We do need a crazy shaker to fight food and pharma.
How would you suggest getting him “to do some good” exactly?
It’s fascinating to me that people make suggestions like this. Remember when Presidents mostly just nominated the best people they could find for the job, those people had appropriate training and experience, and they didn’t need to be “hyped and motivated” by unspecified hypers and motivators to do their critically important jobs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s ironic is that he is in charge of HHS and he doesn’t believe in science or understand scientific research. He’s Trump’s creature.
One doe not "believe" in science, as that implies "faith" and make it a religion.
REAL SCIENCE is 100% about being skeptical. Question everything. Constantly trying to DISPROVE EVERYTHING, that is the Scientific Method.
Science is not about finding "proof" it is about finding things that cannot be disproven, while continuously trying to disprove them.
I am highly skeptical of all these data RFK jr is using to support his positions on food dyes.
Good. Skepticism is good in Science and government.
Too many "yes men" who just go along with the crowd and the rich 1%/politicians/government/corporations.
That's why RFK is appealing to the public, he's asking questions and shaking things up. The more pushback he gets, the more popular he becomes.
His position on dyes is not supported. Why is he making policy decisions based on unproven information?
Anonymous wrote:What people need is to get him to do some good by hyping and motivating him to address major issues. If he does few stupid things, those can be changed once he is gone. We do need a crazy shaker to fight food and pharma.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whats the point of this registry? Why would anyone comply?!
You’ve missed a critical piece of this. It’s not an issue of compliance. RFK jr’s people will be scraping records containing what is supposed to be confidential information. This ranges from records for people on Medicare and Medicaid—- to records from Pharmacies, private insurance companies, smart watches, fitness devices and other sources. Apparently without explicit permission. Those of you who didn’t read the fine print on your 200 page customer agreements for your electronic devices have possibly already given consent though.
It should be obvious, but just in case it isn’t, and sort of data screening like this almost certainly involves looking at all of the data that they can get from any source about everyone that they can. While they might segregate the files of interest, the only way to determine which files are actually of interest is to examine any and all data sets that they have access to.
Who exactly has access to our medical data — and what they decide to do with it at any point in the future —will no longer be under our explicit control. No one is asking for consent here.
To add, No, I didn’t make up the parts about getting data from smart watches, fitness trackers and pharmacies. This stands out to me because the link between smart watch and fitness tracker data is what, exactly?
https://people.com/rfk-jr-to-launch-autism-registry-using-private-health-records-11720156
Period trackers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like MAGAs supported him because they were mad about Government telling them to get vaccinated and mask up....and now he is using Government to tell them they can't eat skittles and M&M's anymore.
Although I guess its sort of like people voting for Trump because they were mad the price of eggs went up, and so now the price of everything will go up.
He's a Kennedy, so people either like them or don't. He seems genuine and a good guy overall about wanting to help clean up the food that corporations and foreign sources have polluted.
Why on Earth are you against that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whats the point of this registry? Why would anyone comply?!
You’ve missed a critical piece of this. It’s not an issue of compliance. RFK jr’s people will be scraping records containing what is supposed to be confidential information. This ranges from records for people on Medicare and Medicaid—- to records from Pharmacies, private insurance companies, smart watches, fitness devices and other sources. Apparently without explicit permission. Those of you who didn’t read the fine print on your 200 page customer agreements for your electronic devices have possibly already given consent though.
It should be obvious, but just in case it isn’t, and sort of data screening like this almost certainly involves looking at all of the data that they can get from any source about everyone that they can. While they might segregate the files of interest, the only way to determine which files are actually of interest is to examine any and all data sets that they have access to.
Who exactly has access to our medical data — and what they decide to do with it at any point in the future —will no longer be under our explicit control. No one is asking for consent here.
To add, No, I didn’t make up the parts about getting data from smart watches, fitness trackers and pharmacies. This stands out to me because the link between smart watch and fitness tracker data is what, exactly?
https://people.com/rfk-jr-to-launch-autism-registry-using-private-health-records-11720156
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s ironic is that he is in charge of HHS and he doesn’t believe in science or understand scientific research. He’s Trump’s creature.
One doe not "believe" in science, as that implies "faith" and make it a religion.
REAL SCIENCE is 100% about being skeptical. Question everything. Constantly trying to DISPROVE EVERYTHING, that is the Scientific Method.
Science is not about finding "proof" it is about finding things that cannot be disproven, while continuously trying to disprove them.
I am highly skeptical of all these data RFK jr is using to support his positions on food dyes.
Good. Skepticism is good in Science and government.
Too many "yes men" who just go along with the crowd and the rich 1%/politicians/government/corporations.
That's why RFK is appealing to the public, he's asking questions and shaking things up. The more pushback he gets, the more popular he becomes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s ironic is that he is in charge of HHS and he doesn’t believe in science or understand scientific research. He’s Trump’s creature.
One doe not "believe" in science, as that implies "faith" and make it a religion.
REAL SCIENCE is 100% about being skeptical. Question everything. Constantly trying to DISPROVE EVERYTHING, that is the Scientific Method.
Science is not about finding "proof" it is about finding things that cannot be disproven, while continuously trying to disprove them.
I am highly skeptical of all these data RFK jr is using to support his positions on food dyes.