Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overweight is hard on joints and also contributes to avoidance of certain exercises. For instance, if I'm overweight, I may feel like I'm running and lifting fine, but I probably avoid pullups, handstand holds, etc. I therefore miss out on a whole range of movement and it becomes a vicious circle.
Also, your reference group ("the best of them") might not really be what you want it to be.
I’m a size 2 and never do handstand holds. It’s not necessary for optimal health. What a strange thing to focus on.
We know nothing about your muscles. Being a size 2 means nothing here and if anything I would not think you’d have strength.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overweight is hard on joints and also contributes to avoidance of certain exercises. For instance, if I'm overweight, I may feel like I'm running and lifting fine, but I probably avoid pullups, handstand holds, etc. I therefore miss out on a whole range of movement and it becomes a vicious circle.
Also, your reference group ("the best of them") might not really be what you want it to be.
I’m a size 2 and never do handstand holds. It’s not necessary for optimal health. What a strange thing to focus on.
Most people have weak shoulders. And then they wonder why they end up having shoulder surgery in their 40s and 50s. "I don't need to do shoulder exercises" is one of the reasons. Handstand holds was just one example, obviously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overweight is hard on joints and also contributes to avoidance of certain exercises. For instance, if I'm overweight, I may feel like I'm running and lifting fine, but I probably avoid pullups, handstand holds, etc. I therefore miss out on a whole range of movement and it becomes a vicious circle.
Also, your reference group ("the best of them") might not really be what you want it to be.
I’m a size 2 and never do handstand holds. It’s not necessary for optimal health. What a strange thing to focus on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something doesn’t add up. I am a size 10, 5’10 and 145. I’m not thin, I’m a healthy weight but you aren’t a size 10 just because you can force yourself into clothing. It should fit nicely.
People are built different. I am 5’6” 147lbs and size 2-4 in non-stretchy clothes. How you are shaped and how much fat vs muscle you carry will affect the size of your clothes. We can’t really judge whether OP should lose weight without seeing how she looks and knowing her body fat %.
How are you a 2-4 at 147lbs? I am 5'6 also, weigh 125lbs. and wear a 2-4. I don't see how you and I wear the same size, with a 22 lbs. difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind, it will be much harder to lose the weight in 5 years than now. Late 30s, I was a bit smaller than your size and didn’t do much about it. I felt fit enough, ate a balanced but not restrictive diet, exercised, etc. 10 years later, I’m 20 pounds heavier even though I eat better and exercise more. It’s impossible for me to drop any weight.
If I could, I’d go back to 38 and work on my fitness and lose that bit of baby weight (last kid at 37).
I am 5 years older than OP and losing weight now (just 10lbs worth of vanity pounds). It is coming off the same way it always was. Calories in vs calories out will always work, before, during and after menopause.
Not necessarily true. I am 55 and trying to lose 15 lbs via weight watchers and the weight is coming off at a snail’s pace. Vs 6 years ago I lost 15 lbs via WW (so ate exactly the same as I am now to lose weight) and I lost 1-2 lbs a week on average.
With WW you are not tracking calories so you do not really have an exact comparison. You might be moving less and your body composition might have deteriorated if you were not lifting during the last six years. So while it might be harder now it is not just because you got older.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something doesn’t add up. I am a size 10, 5’10 and 145. I’m not thin, I’m a healthy weight but you aren’t a size 10 just because you can force yourself into clothing. It should fit nicely.
People are built different. I am 5’6” 147lbs and size 2-4 in non-stretchy clothes. How you are shaped and how much fat vs muscle you carry will affect the size of your clothes. We can’t really judge whether OP should lose weight without seeing how she looks and knowing her body fat %.
How are you a 2-4 at 147lbs? I am 5'6 also, weigh 125lbs. and wear a 2-4. I don't see how you and I wear the same size, with a 22 lbs. difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something doesn’t add up. I am a size 10, 5’10 and 145. I’m not thin, I’m a healthy weight but you aren’t a size 10 just because you can force yourself into clothing. It should fit nicely.
People are built different. I am 5’6” 147lbs and size 2-4 in non-stretchy clothes. How you are shaped and how much fat vs muscle you carry will affect the size of your clothes. We can’t really judge whether OP should lose weight without seeing how she looks and knowing her body fat %.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind, it will be much harder to lose the weight in 5 years than now. Late 30s, I was a bit smaller than your size and didn’t do much about it. I felt fit enough, ate a balanced but not restrictive diet, exercised, etc. 10 years later, I’m 20 pounds heavier even though I eat better and exercise more. It’s impossible for me to drop any weight.
If I could, I’d go back to 38 and work on my fitness and lose that bit of baby weight (last kid at 37).
I am 5 years older than OP and losing weight now (just 10lbs worth of vanity pounds). It is coming off the same way it always was. Calories in vs calories out will always work, before, during and after menopause.
Not necessarily true. I am 55 and trying to lose 15 lbs via weight watchers and the weight is coming off at a snail’s pace. Vs 6 years ago I lost 15 lbs via WW (so ate exactly the same as I am now to lose weight) and I lost 1-2 lbs a week on average.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep in mind, it will be much harder to lose the weight in 5 years than now. Late 30s, I was a bit smaller than your size and didn’t do much about it. I felt fit enough, ate a balanced but not restrictive diet, exercised, etc. 10 years later, I’m 20 pounds heavier even though I eat better and exercise more. It’s impossible for me to drop any weight.
If I could, I’d go back to 38 and work on my fitness and lose that bit of baby weight (last kid at 37).
I am 5 years older than OP and losing weight now (just 10lbs worth of vanity pounds). It is coming off the same way it always was. Calories in vs calories out will always work, before, during and after menopause.
Anonymous wrote:I would focus on nutrients more than weight or size. Are you drinking enough water? reducing/eliminating alcohol? Getting enough protein, fiber, and calcium, and not too much salt or added sugar? If so, and you're happy with your size and what your body can do, then great! But if you could add some water and veggies and lentils and stuff, or cut back a little on ice cream or wine, that's probably worthwhile.
Anonymous wrote:I’m late thirties, three kids, very fit (do circuit workouts 3-4 times a week) but still slightly overweight. Originally I wanted to get back down to a size six before my 40th birthday at the end of this year but now am questioning my motivation. Is there any reason - aside from vanity - why it’s better to be a size 6 than a size 10? Bloodwork is perfect and as mentioned I’m in great shape: can run and lift with the best of them, I have a ton of energy and I’m very active.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overweight is hard on joints and also contributes to avoidance of certain exercises. For instance, if I'm overweight, I may feel like I'm running and lifting fine, but I probably avoid pullups, handstand holds, etc. I therefore miss out on a whole range of movement and it becomes a vicious circle.
Also, your reference group ("the best of them") might not really be what you want it to be.
I’m a size 2 and never do handstand holds. It’s not necessary for optimal health. What a strange thing to focus on.
Anonymous wrote:Overweight is hard on joints and also contributes to avoidance of certain exercises. For instance, if I'm overweight, I may feel like I'm running and lifting fine, but I probably avoid pullups, handstand holds, etc. I therefore miss out on a whole range of movement and it becomes a vicious circle.
Also, your reference group ("the best of them") might not really be what you want it to be.