Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Thank you for this. I KNEW it, but I hadn't seen it so plainly in the numbers. I am furious at the NYT and would like to end my subscription, but I haven't figured out what is better. Any suggestions?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was supposed to have a private meeting with Trump and he ambushed her with reporters. F Trump.

So you think The NY Times was given a head’s up and suspected she’d react in such a way? Her just standing there and getting photographed wouldn’t have gone viral. Her spontaneous childish reaction made this go viral. NY Times is the only pool photographed (out of a dozen?) that got the folder money shot? The whole thing is weird. And it wasn’t the only bad photo. And even friendly in-state outlets helped it go viral. Almost like this had some big coordination behind it to harm her politically — not just as a POTUS candidate but even a VP candidate in 2028.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Well, those are the kinds of articles NYT likes. Instead of reporting actual news, they used a circular narrative re Biden’s age, and never suggested that Trumps age was a problem, a Penn study found.

Is the NYT reporting on this fact, pp? That Trump didn’t even know about the invasion? If not, everyone needs to ask why they’re still supporting them and if you are, ask them why they’re are treating a Michigan woman politician worse than the men ruining the country?

https://css.seas.upenn.edu/new-york-times-a-case-study-in-inconsistent-narrative-selection-and-framing-that-tends-to-favor-republicans/

Anonymous wrote:She was there to get funding to eradicate an invasive fish that is taking over the Great Lakes. Neither Obama nor Biden would give her funding for this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was supposed to have a private meeting with Trump and he ambushed her with reporters. F Trump.

She thought begging Trump for pork for her top donors and Democrat political machines could be done in secret and off the record? That’s a bit naive.

No, she didn’t know they’d make her attend an EO signing unrelated to her visit.

"86 45"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it’s not career ending to accidentally invite WAPO into your war chat then why should this be?

It was The Atlantic, but +100.

"Michigan governor did something dumb after our degenerate of a President ambushed her." I don't care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Gavin Newsom will NEVER win. He's full-on MAGA, which he's made clear.

Californian here. What insanity is this? Please explain.

Listen to his podcast. Listen to how he thinks it’s cute his son idolizes Charlie Kirk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh, why would this be a career ending picture? I was expecting passed out drunk in a ditch with half empty tequila bottle in hand. I'm sure MAGA has been told to foam at the mouth about this.

They are desperate to distract from the fact that not only did Trump's people accidently include a reporter in their military planning ON SIGNAL, but Trump appears not to have been involved in the planning at all. It's actually embarrassing to TRUMP if Biden was in fact severely cognitively impaired as president because he was still worlds better than this dumpster fire.

But sure let's talk about a couple of photos of Whitmer in which she is neither sharing war plans with reporters nor screwing prostitutes. This is sounds like a super important discussion to have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a such a low blow, agree.

She was there to lobby for her state and got sucked into the signing of an EO. Perfectly her right to not wish to be photographed doing that as it implies she may have supported it. Printing this photo was childish and irresponsible. And definitely smacks of being harder on Dems than republicans.

Her “right” not to be photographed? She is public official in a public building on official public business.

Anonymous wrote:If it’s not career ending to accidentally invite WAPO into your war chat then why should this be?