Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There needs to be a lot of outrage over this. In 1992 I stood in the college quad with an ironing board helping students sign up to vote in the hopes that Clinton would win.
No more voter registration drives allowed. I never could have imagined then that my future children would have so many fewer rights than me.
If you’re not outraged, they’re going to take more from you.
In Europe they all need passports. Really shouldn’t be too much trouble for Americans to get one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently it passed?
Thankfully I have a passport but my birth certificate is obviously not under my married name.
This is insanity.
Passed the house. Still pending in senate
Where it faces long odds, according to the NY Times article.
Anonymous wrote:So no one has actually answered the question…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good thing is that wealthy, educated people are more likely to have passports - and to vote D.
Feeling awfully good about being too lazy/stubborn to change my name when I got married.
Also why why why are they trying to drag us back into the dark ages.
As a Dem, I think stupid people should be allowed to vote GOP. It doesn’t give me any satisfaction to take away the rights of people I despise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There needs to be a lot of outrage over this. In 1992 I stood in the college quad with an ironing board helping students sign up to vote in the hopes that Clinton would win.
No more voter registration drives allowed. I never could have imagined then that my future children would have so many fewer rights than me.
If you’re not outraged, they’re going to take more from you.
In Europe they all need passports. Really shouldn’t be too much trouble for Americans to get one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently it passed?
Thankfully I have a passport but my birth certificate is obviously not under my married name.
This is insanity.
Passed the house. Still pending in senate
Where it faces long odds, according to the NY Times article.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only the left would question a voter having to provide an ID to vote
And only the right would make no distinction between *an* ID, like a Real ID and approx 4 forms of ID (Real ID and Birth Certificate AND Marriage license AND proof of residence). I’ve been married 30 years and have no idea where my marriage license is. I haven’t needed it since before we moved 10 years ago.
I do have a passport I’d use. But, most Americans do not. And getting on requires multiple forms of ID. And it looks like you still need to prove residence on top of that.
If the SS Card and Real ID is good enough to get a job and get SS benefits and Real ID is good enough to fly, why aren’t these good enough to vote?
Have their been actual instance of people committing voter fraud after presenting a Real ID (and proof of residency to register to voter)?
Once you’ve jumped through the hoops once, why jump through them again every time you vote? If you show the documentation to vote in 2026, you have been cleared. Why do you need to keep showing it?
Solution in search of a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently it passed?
Thankfully I have a passport but my birth certificate is obviously not under my married name.
This is insanity.
Passed the house. Still pending in senate
Anonymous wrote:Only the left would question a voter having to provide an ID to vote
Anonymous wrote:Only the left would question a voter having to provide an ID to vote
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only the left would question a voter having to provide an ID to vote
Why are you requiring an ID that costs a lot of money + time? They are actually shutting down a lot of the USPS sites for passport interviews. Almost impossible to get right now.
Any ID required for voting should be free. If you don't agree with that, then you don't love freedom, democracy, or liberty.
Anonymous wrote:Only the left would question a voter having to provide an ID to vote