Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although St Andrews has the highest UCAS tariff of the 3 Stockbridge universities its application process (common app) is familiar and the 4 year degree offers some flexibility in terms of double majoring.
That and a $20-$30K per year discount over a number of US choices and St Andrews becomes a very attractive option for an independent kid.
come on now
Come on all you want. For UK students it is just as hard to get in St Andrews. It is a fact. You might not like it. But it is true.
Maybe that’s true - it’s a small university and it takes a lot of international students? But it is nowhere near as desirable for UK students as Oxbridge and its reputation is nowhere close in the UK. It’s totally fine that you like it and that it’s popular with Americans but it is not in the same league as Oxbridge. I can tell you that as a student in a top school in London in 1990/2000s, only one student in my class of 120 wanted to go to St Andrews (she was friends with Prince William and that was why!) and now that my friends have kids of this age in top schools in London it is similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although St Andrews has the highest UCAS tariff of the 3 Stockbridge universities its application process (common app) is familiar and the 4 year degree offers some flexibility in terms of double majoring.
That and a $20-$30K per year discount over a number of US choices and St Andrews becomes a very attractive option for an independent kid.
come on now
Come on all you want. For UK students it is just as hard to get in St Andrews. It is a fact. You might not like it. But it is true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sold on the idea of going abroad for four years. If you can’t get in ivies, what difference does it make between going to Rochester and McGill? What difference between Tulane and St. Andrew’s?
Nobody has to sell you on anything. You can do whatever you want. Just zero reason to come here and criticize those that think different than you.
I have been a Mgmt Consulting and Investment recruiter for 20 years. I’m in NYC. About 13 yrs ago was my first placement of a St Andrews grad. Since then, after conversations with clients, I have placed my fair share of recent St Andrews grads at some of the top firms in NYC. These are the same people hiring at only 10 to 15 colleges in the US. And guess what….they are also hiring Oxbridge kids and St Andrews kids…..they are not hiring Rochester or Tulane kids….This has been my experience. I dont have a kid that goes to St Andrews and have zero attachment to the school other than having placed a bunch of them (more and more with each passing year) at top firms. So much to like about the quality of these kids coming through….
Crazy capitaliser strikes again. So faux.
Isn’t Bucknell better for that pipeline?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another plus is the peers. The UK peers you will have at St Andrews are on par with the top kids in the US. It is much harder for them to get in and most need A*A*A* just to be considered or a 42+/45 IB.
On par with more than that. If the future King of England attended, you know this is a school acceptable to the aristocracy. The idea that that would be appealing to (some, not all, before you come at me) private school kids is a no-brainer.
It’s not just William and Harry who went to StA. A lot of Europe’s royalty goes there.
It’s an excellent school. It’s inexpensive for people with dual citizenship (EU passports) too. Less hand holding than in the US, which I consider a plus. Students there tend to be more independent than in the US except maybe be the top 20 or so US universities that are full of driven, focused kids. No Greek life, which is also a plus imo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sold on the idea of going abroad for four years. If you can’t get in ivies, what difference does it make between going to Rochester and McGill? What difference between Tulane and St. Andrew’s?
Nobody has to sell you on anything. You can do whatever you want. Just zero reason to come here and criticize those that think different than you.
I have been a Mgmt Consulting and Investment recruiter for 20 years. I’m in NYC. About 13 yrs ago was my first placement of a St Andrews grad. Since then, after conversations with clients, I have placed my fair share of recent St Andrews grads at some of the top firms in NYC. These are the same people hiring at only 10 to 15 colleges in the US. And guess what….they are also hiring Oxbridge kids and St Andrews kids…..they are not hiring Rochester or Tulane kids….This has been my experience. I dont have a kid that goes to St Andrews and have zero attachment to the school other than having placed a bunch of them (more and more with each passing year) at top firms. So much to like about the quality of these kids coming through….
Isn’t Bucknell better for that pipeline?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sold on the idea of going abroad for four years. If you can’t get in ivies, what difference does it make between going to Rochester and McGill? What difference between Tulane and St. Andrew’s?
Nobody has to sell you on anything. You can do whatever you want. Just zero reason to come here and criticize those that think different than you.
I have been a Mgmt Consulting and Investment recruiter for 20 years. I’m in NYC. About 13 yrs ago was my first placement of a St Andrews grad. Since then, after conversations with clients, I have placed my fair share of recent St Andrews grads at some of the top firms in NYC. These are the same people hiring at only 10 to 15 colleges in the US. And guess what….they are also hiring Oxbridge kids and St Andrews kids…..they are not hiring Rochester or Tulane kids….This has been my experience. I dont have a kid that goes to St Andrews and have zero attachment to the school other than having placed a bunch of them (more and more with each passing year) at top firms. So much to like about the quality of these kids coming through….
Anonymous wrote:I am not sold on the idea of going abroad for four years. If you can’t get in ivies, what difference does it make between going to Rochester and McGill? What difference between Tulane and St. Andrew’s?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Although St Andrews has the highest UCAS tariff of the 3 Stockbridge universities its application process (common app) is familiar and the 4 year degree offers some flexibility in terms of double majoring.
That and a $20-$30K per year discount over a number of US choices and St Andrews becomes a very attractive option for an independent kid.
come on now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another plus is the peers. The UK peers you will have at St Andrews are on par with the top kids in the US. It is much harder for them to get in and most need A*A*A* just to be considered or a 42+/45 IB.
On par with more than that. If the future King of England attended, you know this is a school acceptable to the aristocracy. The idea that that would be appealing to (some, not all, before you come at me) private school kids is a no-brainer.
Anonymous wrote:Although St Andrews has the highest UCAS tariff of the 3 Stockbridge universities its application process (common app) is familiar and the 4 year degree offers some flexibility in terms of double majoring.
That and a $20-$30K per year discount over a number of US choices and St Andrews becomes a very attractive option for an independent kid.
come on nowAnonymous wrote:I am not sold on the idea of going abroad for four years. If you can’t get in ivies, what difference does it make between going to Rochester and McGill? What difference between Tulane and St. Andrew’s?