lol what do you thinkAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter almost did one of those programs, but she ended up getting a real internship doing research at UMD. So I think that is going to be a more impressive story than the pay to play situation. Plus, her internship is 5 weeks...a bigger commitment. She will be working with a graduate student.
That's great! Was it through your connections or did she manage it on her own?
Anonymous wrote:My daughter almost did one of those programs, but she ended up getting a real internship doing research at UMD. So I think that is going to be a more impressive story than the pay to play situation. Plus, her internship is 5 weeks...a bigger commitment. She will be working with a graduate student.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter almost did one of those programs, but she ended up getting a real internship doing research at UMD. So I think that is going to be a more impressive story than the pay to play situation. Plus, her internship is 5 weeks...a bigger commitment. She will be working with a graduate student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC participated in one of the”pay to play” at an Ivy (still had to fill out app, write essays, get LOR’s, transcripts so it wasn’t “pay and you’re in”) and then participated in another that was specific to their interest, highly competitive and required all of the above plus resume and more.
The latter expressly told the participants that it would help them if they applied ED but I realize that’s a rarity with these programs. Regardless, they were selected which looks great and it earned them college credit.
U Chicago.
Nope (I knew people would assume that but it wasn’t)
Which school was it then?
I'm kind of shocked that a major university would tell people that attending their pay to play summer program would help them if they apply ED.
U chicago even went as far as creating a separate ED (ED0) for their summer payees.
It says a lot about the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC participated in one of the”pay to play” at an Ivy (still had to fill out app, write essays, get LOR’s, transcripts so it wasn’t “pay and you’re in”) and then participated in another that was specific to their interest, highly competitive and required all of the above plus resume and more.
The latter expressly told the participants that it would help them if they applied ED but I realize that’s a rarity with these programs. Regardless, they were selected which looks great and it earned them college credit.
U Chicago.
Nope (I knew people would assume that but it wasn’t)
Which school was it then?
I'm kind of shocked that a major university would tell people that attending their pay to play summer program would help them if they apply ED.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC participated in one of the”pay to play” at an Ivy (still had to fill out app, write essays, get LOR’s, transcripts so it wasn’t “pay and you’re in”) and then participated in another that was specific to their interest, highly competitive and required all of the above plus resume and more.
The latter expressly told the participants that it would help them if they applied ED but I realize that’s a rarity with these programs. Regardless, they were selected which looks great and it earned them college credit.
U Chicago.
Nope (I knew people would assume that but it wasn’t)
Which school was it then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC participated in one of the”pay to play” at an Ivy (still had to fill out app, write essays, get LOR’s, transcripts so it wasn’t “pay and you’re in”) and then participated in another that was specific to their interest, highly competitive and required all of the above plus resume and more.
The latter expressly told the participants that it would help them if they applied ED but I realize that’s a rarity with these programs. Regardless, they were selected which looks great and it earned them college credit.
U Chicago.
Nope (I knew people would assume that but it wasn’t)
While donating to your kids private school is technically a nonprofit and deductible, i wouldn't consider it a charity. YMMVAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:just because I can afford to, doesn't mean I will go around lighting money on fire.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes yes that gives you plausible deniability that you are just wealthy and lighting money on fire.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are college counselors dissuading kids from participating in so-called "pay to play" programs on the basis that they signal wealth and privilege?
Private school, club sports or other expensive ECs - not to mention the parents' professions and zip code - also signal wealth and privilege but no college counselor is discouraging those types of things. Also, isn't "full pay" suppose to be an advantage in college admissions so, for example, it would be good for my public school kid to participate in an expensive program to signal that we are "full pay"?
People say that "pay to play" won't give your kid an advantage in getting into colleges, but from what I've seen from the current seniors, a good number of them did do a pre-college program at a college and also got into that college. I can think of specific kids who did pre-college programs at Brown, Duke, UChicago, Northwestern, U. Michigan, Georgetown, and were accepted to those schools senior year. They probably did leverage that "pay to play" summer experience in essays and activities lists to show "demonstrated interest."
I think this is a case of "wishful thinking" on our part. They don't help anything except the bottom line of the offering school.
A summer program can help the application tell a credible story. If the applicant says they want to major in X, and they did a summer pre-college program in X, then that program is helpful to the application. They also help your kid get a better understanding of whether or not they really do want to major in X.
You can take classes at a CC, or online (OCW, coursera) classes, yadda yadda. come on people, be serious.
You sound bitter and jealous.
The fact that you describe $3,500 summer class tuition as “lighting money on fire” means you can’t REALLY afford it. We regularly spend over 100k on charity each year. A check for a few thousand dollars is nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are college counselors dissuading kids from participating in so-called "pay to play" programs on the basis that they signal wealth and privilege?
Private school, club sports or other expensive ECs - not to mention the parents' professions and zip code - also signal wealth and privilege but no college counselor is discouraging those types of things. Also, isn't "full pay" suppose to be an advantage in college admissions so, for example, it would be good for my public school kid to participate in an expensive program to signal that we are "full pay"?
People say that "pay to play" won't give your kid an advantage in getting into colleges, but from what I've seen from the current seniors, a good number of them did do a pre-college program at a college and also got into that college. I can think of specific kids who did pre-college programs at Brown, Duke, UChicago, Northwestern, U. Michigan, Georgetown, and were accepted to those schools senior year. They probably did leverage that "pay to play" summer experience in essays and activities lists to show "demonstrated interest."
I think this is a case of "wishful thinking" on our part. They don't help anything except the bottom line of the offering school.
A summer program can help the application tell a credible story. If the applicant says they want to major in X, and they did a summer pre-college program in X, then that program is helpful to the application. They also help your kid get a better understanding of whether or not they really do want to major in X.
Anonymous wrote:just because I can afford to, doesn't mean I will go around lighting money on fire.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes yes that gives you plausible deniability that you are just wealthy and lighting money on fire.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are college counselors dissuading kids from participating in so-called "pay to play" programs on the basis that they signal wealth and privilege?
Private school, club sports or other expensive ECs - not to mention the parents' professions and zip code - also signal wealth and privilege but no college counselor is discouraging those types of things. Also, isn't "full pay" suppose to be an advantage in college admissions so, for example, it would be good for my public school kid to participate in an expensive program to signal that we are "full pay"?
People say that "pay to play" won't give your kid an advantage in getting into colleges, but from what I've seen from the current seniors, a good number of them did do a pre-college program at a college and also got into that college. I can think of specific kids who did pre-college programs at Brown, Duke, UChicago, Northwestern, U. Michigan, Georgetown, and were accepted to those schools senior year. They probably did leverage that "pay to play" summer experience in essays and activities lists to show "demonstrated interest."
I think this is a case of "wishful thinking" on our part. They don't help anything except the bottom line of the offering school.
A summer program can help the application tell a credible story. If the applicant says they want to major in X, and they did a summer pre-college program in X, then that program is helpful to the application. They also help your kid get a better understanding of whether or not they really do want to major in X.
You can take classes at a CC, or online (OCW, coursera) classes, yadda yadda. come on people, be serious.
You sound bitter and jealous.