Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone that I know that was accepted to school without walls has a 4.0 GPA. My guess is that these kids also have high cape scores. I don’t think adding a test will change the results very much.
Wrong.
Most of Walls is BELOW grade level in math, as measured by CAPE scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In favor of testing as a requirement in general. But that won't solve the issue at the high school level. DCPS needs a magnet program that starts around 4th-5th grade. Math is the real issue. Most of the middle schools don't have enough of an advanced cohort to offer advanced math. One solution would be to pull the advanced kids out 2-3 days a week for centralized instruction in math.
Our school has less than 1 handful of kids taking geometry in 8th grade but the school still offers it. Schools can make the choice even if it's just 1-2 students.
No school would make the choice for 1-2 students. They don't have the resources.
That's not true. Our DCPS MS is doing it for less than 5 kids right now.
Our charter MS has announced that they will offer geometry as well, for an anticipated 3-10 kids.
I assume these kids will be taking an online geometry course because what school could possibly have the funding next year for a class of 5 kids? They will be in thr back of the room on a computer.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone that I know that was accepted to school without walls has a 4.0 GPA. My guess is that these kids also have high cape scores. I don’t think adding a test will change the results very much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard now has remedial math.
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/opinion/harvard-univ-the-ivy-league-teaching-remedial-math/
Many top schools are bringing back standardized testing because of issues above and that these students tend to fail out and not graduate at all.
Walls has been test-free for 5 years now, and there has been no issue with kids failing out or not graduating.
Well that's a low bar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard now has remedial math.
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/opinion/harvard-univ-the-ivy-league-teaching-remedial-math/
Many top schools are bringing back standardized testing because of issues above and that these students tend to fail out and not graduate at all.
Walls has been test-free for 5 years now, and there has been no issue with kids failing out or not graduating.
Well that's a low bar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard now has remedial math.
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/opinion/harvard-univ-the-ivy-league-teaching-remedial-math/
Many top schools are bringing back standardized testing because of issues above and that these students tend to fail out and not graduate at all.
Walls has been test-free for 5 years now, and there has been no issue with kids failing out or not graduating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard now has remedial math.
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/opinion/harvard-univ-the-ivy-league-teaching-remedial-math/
Many top schools are bringing back standardized testing because of issues above and that these students tend to fail out and not graduate at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard now has remedial math.
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/opinion/harvard-univ-the-ivy-league-teaching-remedial-math/
Anonymous wrote:
The most selective academic high school in DC has kids who aren't at grade level. Do you think that's true at Harvard and MIT?
Harvard is quick to blame these math gaps on pandemic learning losses — but, in truth, administrators brought this mess on themselves by scrapping standardized testing requirements during the pandemic, all in the name of equity.
Anonymous wrote:From my understanding the issue is that there are not enough seats to take all worthy students - just like at universities. Many top students are turned away at Harvard, MIT, etc.
The teacher recommendations actually add a layer that I appreciate. Future job skills require collaboration, communication, and other soft skills that a teacher is better at fielding. Tests cannot determine if a students has high emotional intelligence or some other incredible skill that made them stand out.
Interviewers I spoke with said that the students selected all had an “it” factor. Something that made them unique and stand out as being a future leader. The selection decisions are not all academic although almost all of them had 4.0s.
I would not want “take the highest test takers” and they are in. That is very short-sighted and very old school. We have evolved from that model. Colleges use a holistic approach.
Why do you want to take our kids backwards?
Anonymous wrote:Yes- but I don’t think it will happen while Bowser is in charge. Unless Trump demands she change it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to gauge interest--would anyone join/support a group seeking require dcps only use objective and transparent examination process for admission to Banneker and SWW?
You seem to know very little about admissions processes. This is not a thing. Even "objective" measures have subjective components. Do you think colleges and elite prep schools take all GPAs at face value in the admissions process? Spoiler alert: they do not. There is a multiplier for every school in the US. Harvard isn't evaluating a kid with a 4.0 from Eastern high the same as one from Exeter. Exeter isn't evaluating a kid with a 4.0 from Sousa MS in DC the same as a kid with a 4.0 from Fieldston MS in NYC. In order to make an "objective" measure work they'd have to adjust DC MS GPAs. Can you just imagine the optics and uproar from the performative DC "equity" crowd when it is discovered that [GASP] BASIS's GPAs are given more weight than schools from poor black neighborhoods!
Anonymous wrote:Trying to gauge interest--would anyone join/support a group seeking require dcps only use objective and transparent examination process for admission to Banneker and SWW?