Anonymous wrote:I feel that some folks are focusing on the wrong goal. Yes, a Harvard A.B. in Econ. will earn much more than a DeVry B.A. in Econ., but a Harvard A.B. in Art History won't earn more than a DeVry B.A. in Econ.
that excuse was used by ivies in the first half of the 1900s to deny jewish students because they were scoring too highAnonymous wrote:The AOs are still too focused on test scores and GPA. We need to better understand what drives professional success and leadership down the line. Schools clearly don't just want the "best college students" in purely academic terms, which I think is a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basically title - and I'm not being sarcastic. I looked at the resume of a local kid going to Harvard and my mind was blown. National merit finalist. 4.0. But those were a given. After that, he racked up at least 7 individual awards including the Harvard book award from Junior year, a superintendent award given to one student per district. He also had mind blowing extra curriculars that he led/founded. This led me to another one from my town who played a niche sport, sang as a soloist and in a huge choir but also racked up tons of science fair awards and grants. Both of these students could have been three students with the amount of success they'd seen in high school. Are they ALL like this? Are your kids like this?
Not the kids so much, but I see their parents as truly special. Without them good things don't happen for their kids. Just ask them.
I have a kid at HYP and her group's parents are pretty impressive. Kid of prime minister, academy award winner, another very famous politician, billionaire family, CEO dad of large forture 500. As I write this it doesn't even sound real to me. We are nobodies but somehow our kid was admitted.
Your kid is more impressive because she got in despite not having any connections. The other kids are there mainly because of their parents. Congratulations!
Anonymous wrote:Even if OP’s premise is correct, they aren’t exclusive to these colleges. You could easily fill an entire class of equally “special” and equally smart students from a pool of people completely shut out from these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basically title - and I'm not being sarcastic. I looked at the resume of a local kid going to Harvard and my mind was blown. National merit finalist. 4.0. But those were a given. After that, he racked up at least 7 individual awards including the Harvard book award from Junior year, a superintendent award given to one student per district. He also had mind blowing extra curriculars that he led/founded. This led me to another one from my town who played a niche sport, sang as a soloist and in a huge choir but also racked up tons of science fair awards and grants. Both of these students could have been three students with the amount of success they'd seen in high school. Are they ALL like this? Are your kids like this?
Not the kids so much, but I see their parents as truly special. Without them good things don't happen for their kids. Just ask them.
I have a kid at HYP and her group's parents are pretty impressive. Kid of prime minister, academy award winner, another very famous politician, billionaire family, CEO dad of large forture 500. As I write this it doesn't even sound real to me. We are nobodies but somehow our kid was admitted.
Yes, but these days it’s only MIT that really focuses on an applicant’s genuine talent and ability. At HYPS, it’s almost as if they are admitting the parents instead of the students. Lame. Real talent goes elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no one thinks they will be doing their athletics, music, or non profit at HYP or afterwards on wallstreetAnonymous wrote:Some kids are able to do all these activities because they go to less demanding high schools. Once at a more demanding college, they can't keep up.
MIT protects athletics on the daily schedule. I found it easier to do athletics at MIT than in high school where the tennis team required 5 to 8 hours of practice + matches daily.
5 to 8 hours of practice…a week? That seems reasonable. Daily? That seems nuts.
What high school other than say IMG Academy would have that kind of practice schedule?
Anonymous wrote:no one thinks they will be doing their athletics, music, or non profit at HYP or afterwards on wallstreetAnonymous wrote:Some kids are able to do all these activities because they go to less demanding high schools. Once at a more demanding college, they can't keep up.
Anonymous wrote:MIT nor the state schools are the paragons of merit that the conservative Ivy haters want you to believe they are. State schools don’t even reject legacies at a high rate. They are letting in donors and kids of notables in too. It’s just that they are donors and notables of a lesser quality. In many cases, far lesser.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of curated EC, paid packaging, legacy/connections. The ivy admits I know from this cycle are bright AND have all of the above. Great kids but not exceptional. The narrative building starts early and the kids do have impressive/distinctive experiences and awards to showcase and write about. The holistic process of top schools offers many pathways to acceptance...and top stats/rigor is just 1 of many considerations.