Anonymous wrote:Is it possible that these are the kids with the truly off-the-charts recommendations?
After all, the same recommendations go to all the schools. My sense is that there are a few kids every year who are top of the class AND have genuinely strong and real relationships with the teachers and counselor who write their recommendations. So they’re a completely different level of effusive, specific, and authentic that most high-stats kids have.
Basically, in a world where everything else can be curated, fished, or faked, there’s still one piece of the application that has the potential to be truly genuine and therefore illuminating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
Agree and this is far better than pretending to have an obscure interest to game it. Certainly they are eyes wide open on that tactic at this point. Part of the reason Yale has mentioned selecting people for interviews, to validate it all.
I've seen a couple of kids w manufactured interests and paid for research that got into T20 schools. One even said, he's not interested at all in that major but it worked. Felt like a sucker telling my kid to be honest with their voice
You (and I) did the right thing. There were times in the HS process I had to check myself. But I sincerely believe that it isn't good for kids to create a "story" for them that isn't genuine. What does that tell them about themselves?
Some kids do have genuine stories. But no one’s shown them how to tell it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
+ This! My DS is an extreme introvert and his apps did not land well at all. That said, he’s doing very well in college (STEM) and even landed a paid internship in a research lab — so there is hope! 😊
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
+ This! My DS is an extreme introvert and his apps did not land well at all. That said, he’s doing very well in college (STEM) and even landed a paid internship in a research lab — so there is hope! 😊
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
Agree and this is far better than pretending to have an obscure interest to game it. Certainly they are eyes wide open on that tactic at this point. Part of the reason Yale has mentioned selecting people for interviews, to validate it all.
I've seen a couple of kids w manufactured interests and paid for research that got into T20 schools. One even said, he's not interested at all in that major but it worked. Felt like a sucker telling my kid to be honest with their voice
You (and I) did the right thing. There were times in the HS process I had to check myself. But I sincerely believe that it isn't good for kids to create a "story" for them that isn't genuine. What does that tell them about themselves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
Agree and this is far better than pretending to have an obscure interest to game it. Certainly they are eyes wide open on that tactic at this point. Part of the reason Yale has mentioned selecting people for interviews, to validate it all.
I've seen a couple of kids w manufactured interests and paid for research that got into T20 schools. One even said, he's not interested at all in that major but it worked. Felt like a sucker telling my kid to be honest with their voice
Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible that these are the kids with the truly off-the-charts recommendations?
After all, the same recommendations go to all the schools. My sense is that there are a few kids every year who are top of the class AND have genuinely strong and real relationships with the teachers and counselor who write their recommendations. So they’re a completely different level of effusive, specific, and authentic that most high-stats kids have.
Basically, in a world where everything else can be curated, fished, or faked, there’s still one piece of the application that has the potential to be truly genuine and therefore illuminating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the magic dust is people skills and good (written and oral) communication. Some people are just naturally born with it, and then hone their skills further. Others, like my autistic son, will never be good at that, no matter how hard they try.
Agree and this is far better than pretending to have an obscure interest to game it. Certainly they are eyes wide open on that tactic at this point. Part of the reason Yale has mentioned selecting people for interviews, to validate it all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I've noticed this. However a lot is major choice among kids from private high schools. Colleges know that everyone over a 3.8 coming from high school ABC is going to be well prepared and can do the work. So they pick the one who will study what they need them to study.
Then you add in some charisma and an extracurricular or two that backs up the obscure major and they get in everywhere.
Fun fact: We know 2 families at our private who did this with the same obscure major/EC (deliberately chosen) and they had to coordinate their DC's applications so they wouldn't apply to the same school (PS it worked, both got T20 ED).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2025 parent here. What I am noticing among DC's friends is kids getting into everything or nothing. There are a handful of superstars in the grade, pretty widely known (small school). And even among that cohort, it's pretty clear that some kids are just hitting the mark with AOs. One girl we know has (so far) gotten into UM, UVA, Vandy, Emory, USC, and Hopkins. I predict she'll get into 3+ Ivies. And then similarly qualified kids have been rejected everywhere.
Who knows what the magic is - particularly strong recs, a "story" that hangs together...who knows?
Update: The girl above got into 4 Ivies, include 2 of HYP.
Major??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2025 parent here. What I am noticing among DC's friends is kids getting into everything or nothing. There are a handful of superstars in the grade, pretty widely known (small school). And even among that cohort, it's pretty clear that some kids are just hitting the mark with AOs. One girl we know has (so far) gotten into UM, UVA, Vandy, Emory, USC, and Hopkins. I predict she'll get into 3+ Ivies. And then similarly qualified kids have been rejected everywhere.
Who knows what the magic is - particularly strong recs, a "story" that hangs together...who knows?
Update: The girl above got into 4 Ivies, include 2 of HYP.
Anonymous wrote:2025 parent here. What I am noticing among DC's friends is kids getting into everything or nothing. There are a handful of superstars in the grade, pretty widely known (small school). And even among that cohort, it's pretty clear that some kids are just hitting the mark with AOs. One girl we know has (so far) gotten into UM, UVA, Vandy, Emory, USC, and Hopkins. I predict she'll get into 3+ Ivies. And then similarly qualified kids have been rejected everywhere.
Who knows what the magic is - particularly strong recs, a "story" that hangs together...who knows?