She just filled out his wrinkles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s Dorian Gray but in reverse.

I love you.

Trump looks like the Dorian Gray in the portrait in the attic. You can see the evil in the orange goo he sweats.

Anonymous wrote:I can't stand Trump, but that's a poorly done "portrait." Very amateurish.

Trump is a poorly done human being, so it’s fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s gross, end of story.

He's gross, and she's a mediocre painter. She should stick to something other than faces and portraits.

Mediocre is what she saw, and that is being generous!

Artist can’t create what doesn’t exist, in his mind he think he is a handsome boy but we all know he is delusional. This portrait is an extremely generous representation of what is really there.

Anonymous wrote:Actually Trump looks better in that portrait than he does on camera.

Yes
In realize life, he looks like an evil spirit

Actually Trump looks better in that portrait than he does on camera.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The artist paints in a George Washington era style. Stiff and expressionless. She's really not very good.

But in person he’s petulant and angry. He doesn’t have a Bush grandfatherly kindness or Obama enthusiasm and energy vein she could tap into. He’s soul is really a mean, petulant, nasty, get retribution, small minded place. You can’t capture humanity that just isn’t there. Would you have preferred he captured the mean, nasty soul? I know you wanted her to just invent this likable, empathetic person for a portrait. But that isn’t him. At lead she made him look serious and statesmanlike. Because even that is a yugggggeee stretch.

PP here. I'm no Trump fan and don't really care about his portraits and what they convey. I do know that she painted his face in an amaterish way. Evidently, she doesn't know how to paint eyes and noses. I would be embarrassed to say I painted in that way and put my name on it.

Those eyes and nose are much more flattering than the ones he actually has

Thank you for the laughs, DCUM. I have really enjoyed this thread.

He wants a portrait that makes him look like a macho superhero like his cult members create.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The artist paints in a George Washington era style. Stiff and expressionless. She's really not very good.

But in person he’s petulant and angry. He doesn’t have a Bush grandfatherly kindness or Obama enthusiasm and energy vein she could tap into. He’s soul is really a mean, petulant, nasty, get retribution, small minded place. You can’t capture humanity that just isn’t there. Would you have preferred he captured the mean, nasty soul? I know you wanted her to just invent this likable, empathetic person for a portrait. But that isn’t him. At lead she made him look serious and statesmanlike. Because even that is a yugggggeee stretch.

PP here. I'm no Trump fan and don't really care about his portraits and what they convey. I do know that she painted his face in an amaterish way. Evidently, she doesn't know how to paint eyes and noses. I would be embarrassed to say I painted in that way and put my name on it.

How/Why does he have time for this crap? It’s so obvious the man doesn’t do anything but golf, rage tweet, and chat with his bestie Elon.

Who is running the White House as it sure isn’t Trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s gross, end of story.

He's gross, and she's a mediocre painter. She should stick to something other than faces and portraits.

I read an article this morning with the background (GOP funded, GOP okayed the painter, GOP provided the photo he wanted her to go off of GOP accepted the photo, did the ceremony and hung it, so leave Dems out of it). She does the official portraits for Colorado after the guy who had done them back to about Carter died. She also did Obama. Which no one has seen or cares about, because Obama has better things to do than rage tweet about a portrait in a statehouse. No one would have seen this or care if he would focus for 2 minute of social security or the economy or anything of substance.

Anonymous wrote:It’s Dorian Gray but in reverse.

I love you.

Anonymous wrote:The artist paints in a George Washington era style. Stiff and expressionless. She's really not very good.

But in person he’s petulant and angry. He doesn’t have a Bush grandfatherly kindness or Obama enthusiasm and energy vein she could tap into. He’s soul is really a mean, petulant, nasty, get retribution, small minded place. You can’t capture humanity that just isn’t there. Would you have preferred he captured the mean, nasty soul? I know you wanted her to just invent this likable, empathetic person for a portrait. But that isn’t him. At lead she made him look serious and statesmanlike. Because even that is a yugggggeee stretch.