Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, watch how long it takes FoxNews to pick up the story about the Discord group chat and accidentally included reporter re: Houthi military operation.
Well they finally did cover it a couple hours after every other major outlet, of course when it got so big they could not ignore it.
They already downplayed the main article to a VERY small font header while the biggest headline with huge font is about Hesgeth blasting the story as untrue.![]()
![]()
OP, this is quintessential FoxNews. Delayed reporting it, then did when they realized it had blown up so much, they could not ignore it, they did report it. However, they then quickly downgrade it visibly on their website while overemphasizing their "spin" or "narrative."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, watch how long it takes FoxNews to pick up the story about the Discord group chat and accidentally included reporter re: Houthi military operation.
Well they finally did cover it a couple hours after every other major outlet, of course when it got so big they could not ignore it.
They already downplayed the main article to a VERY small font header while the biggest headline with huge font is about Hesgeth blasting the story as untrue.![]()
![]()
OP, this is quintessential FoxNews. Delayed reporting it, then did when they realized it had blown up so much, they could not ignore it, they did report it. However, they then quickly downgrade it visibly on their website while overemphasizing their "spin" or "narrative."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, watch how long it takes FoxNews to pick up the story about the Discord group chat and accidentally included reporter re: Houthi military operation.
Well they finally did cover it a couple hours after every other major outlet, of course when it got so big they could not ignore it.
Anonymous wrote:OP, watch how long it takes FoxNews to pick up the story about the Discord group chat and accidentally included reporter re: Houthi military operation.
Anonymous wrote:Does Fox News ever cover trans folks, or do they try to erase their existence?
Anonymous wrote:Not covering this, Republican lawmakers backtracking because their abortion laws were too strict and caused harm to women. This comes after Propublica found a fifty percent increase in maternal sepsis rates in TX since Dobbs.
https://apnews.com/article/texas-abortion-medical-exceptions-legislation-aab7ae983006d5872e1adba8d60f8368
“We’ve learned in a number of cases where the physician was willing to treat the mom, but the lawyers for the hospital would advise against it,” Hughes said. “So one of the most important things we want to do is make sure that doctors and the hospital lawyers are trained on what the law is.”
Hughes’ proposed legislation follows similar efforts by Kentucky lawmakers who added medical exceptions to their state’s near-total abortion ban on Thursday."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone upthread said “the stock market correction.” Bingo. The next time major news outlets are reporting that the stock market is down 10% from a year ago, or something similar and using objective data like that, take screenshots of the first 3 pages of the Fox News website, then the same with NY Times, Al Jazeera, CNN, etc.
Because I did, and at the same time the other major news sites were reporting on this “correction” and hypothesizing it was because of erratic tariff application and withdrawal, Fox was filled with stories instead about Trans people trying to use a bathroom, or making fun of AOC, or something similar. I don’t know how far you would have to scroll down on the Fox site to see the loss huge decrease in stock market value, but it wasn’t there in the first three pages.
This.
This absolutely. OP you can easily do it yourself by checking Fox and other outlet. Recent example: yesterday i opened WSJ.com and first bug news was Musk about to be briefed at the Pentagon on the US’ secret plans on fighting China in a war. Checked CNN.com and nytimes.com and if i remember theguardian.com and the news was there prominently. Checked foxnews.com and could not see it anywhere. That was a pretty big news but fox readers could keep themselves occupied wiht the latest bad photo of AOC or the female teacher in montana accused of molesting a kid
They covered that pretty extensively. That is how I found out about the fake news.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/left-loses-over-possibility-musk-top-secret-china-briefing-no-business
That's not news, it's an opinion piece that puts all focus on the left's reaction as opposed to putting any attention on the actual story.
And by the way, whenever Trump calls something "fake news," history has shown us that more often than not it means it's TRUE news that Trump just didn't want getting out.
Translation: I was wrong that Fox didn't cover the story so I will divert to insults and ignore the fact that every official has denied a story that was thinly sourced by "anonymous" sources.
It wasn’t covered by them. They just criticized the other sources coverage when it became too big to ignore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watch both sides because they both omit a ton. Just as many important stories omitted from CNN as there are from Fox. And MSNBC is like an alternate universe.
Can you give specific examples of when you’ve noticed that CNN or MSNBC did not cover something or “omitted a ton”?
Good grief.
You only need to go back a few years to the Russian collusion delusion to see how these networks bought the whole narrative hook line and sinker.
Any serious network or publication would have questioned much of the "information" that was being put out there. Instead, they simply went along with the narrative.
And, then there is the Hunter laptop story. These networks pushed the letter by the "51 former intelligence officials" that was false.
Give me a break.
Recent events kinda proves this was right.