Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
The father of his wife, who is a US citizen so they can't deport her, was said to be an advisor to Hamas years ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
So ICE and the DOJ should have to problem presenting all that evidence in a hearing.
This. We still are a nation of laws, not men. The Trump administration will have to prove its case before a court of law. No extrajudicial action allowed in the United States.
I mean - are we?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
So ICE and the DOJ should have to problem presenting all that evidence in a hearing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
So ICE and the DOJ should have to problem presenting all that evidence in a hearing.
This. We still are a nation of laws, not men. The Trump administration will have to prove its case before a court of law. No extrajudicial action allowed in the United States.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
So ICE and the DOJ should have to problem presenting all that evidence in a hearing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you know anyone traveling to the US from abroad, make sure they scrub their text messages before they arrive. Or, better yet, have them travel with a phone bought just for travel. Apparently, the Thought Police (authorities at US ports of entry) can ask to see your cell phone and can check your text messages. Don't speak ill of Dear Leader--or else! Wonder how long before they start censoring citizens...
French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump found
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/trump-musk-french-scientist-detained
How did they find phone messages about Trump?
Anonymous wrote:If you know anyone traveling to the US from abroad, make sure they scrub their text messages before they arrive. Or, better yet, have them travel with a phone bought just for travel. Apparently, the Thought Police (authorities at US ports of entry) can ask to see your cell phone and can check your text messages. Don't speak ill of Dear Leader--or else! Wonder how long before they start censoring citizens...
French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump found
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/trump-musk-french-scientist-detained
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Let the facts play out. The public does not know what those close connections are and/or whether he took any steps to support Hamas.
Who did he vote for? Or did he sit out this election in protest. I'll withhold my sympathy until I know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Let the facts play out. The public does not know what those close connections are and/or whether he took any steps to support Hamas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is fascism. He is being punished for social media posts critical of Israel and India. That is all he did.
He never said or did anything pro Hamas?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.