Anonymous wrote:How much time you’ll waste trying it understand a process that is largely unknowable as we won’t ever be able to predict institutional priorities.
+100
Just reading the early comments I am see many that show people still didn't learn but many learned a great deal.
Key take aways:
At top schools peak stats only get you onto the playing field. Once you cross the bar they are not a differentiator.
All things being equal a hooked kid has an advantage over an unhooked kid. The hooked kid has crossed the bar for #1 above just like the "higher Stats" kid.
Academic contests are just an EC unless you place well. If you reach the peak they are great but if you don't they matter less than many believe because they don't create "breadth" of excellence.
The story matters. Why your kid is an interesting person to have on campus really matters when there are thousands of similar high performing kids to choose from.
Athletic recruits aren't lesser academics at top schools. Many of them have stats which go toe to toe with anyone though there are some who are given more leeway than a NARP (loved that term) applicant.
Institutional priorities are the greatest determinant and the greatest known unknowable at top schools. They have a huge pool of qualified candidates to choose from and they pick what they want.
Large publics are among the best Engineering/CS schools
Elite SLACs provide the best undergraduate education outside of Engineering/CS
The T10 are believed by many to provide the best of both of the above.
You can get a great education at any school in the T200 so prioritize fit over 'Prestige' unless you are focused on a few specific careers such as IB/MBB.
Some people are far too focused on what they social circle will say if a kid doesn't attend the 'right school'. These people need to get a grip as their kids mental health is more important than what their friends think.