Anonymous wrote:As someone who was gravely ill in my early 39s, I’ve learned people can not be expected to come through when things are hard Most think a text checking in is the work of a saint
Anonymous wrote:My dad had a couple of friends who visited consistently and a couple who didn't. I appreciated the friends who did, but didn't blame the friends who didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people are unrealistic about this. My parents are living it right now. Their friend group is in failing health because they're all of similar age (early part of the baby boom) and they all stupidly thought they wouldn't grow old, they could live in a snowy rural area forever, and that they would take care of each other. Well guess what, they're all old now, some of them are sick and others are dead, and their adult children have left the area and are overwhelmed just trying to care for their parents and have no time for their parents' friends. A few of the wives are younger, but not necessarily healthier, and not necessarily interested in providing a lot of support to anyone they aren't married to. Probably like 10% of the people are net caregivers, the other 90% are net recipients of care, and it's just not working. Maybe when some of the sickest people die or move away to be near their adult children, it could improve. But in general the whole system doesn't work, like anyone not in denial could plainly see.
I wish more adamantly child free ppl could read this. No amount of friends is doing to save them at the end
So, do you think most people have their children caring for them at the end of life?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people are unrealistic about this. My parents are living it right now. Their friend group is in failing health because they're all of similar age (early part of the baby boom) and they all stupidly thought they wouldn't grow old, they could live in a snowy rural area forever, and that they would take care of each other. Well guess what, they're all old now, some of them are sick and others are dead, and their adult children have left the area and are overwhelmed just trying to care for their parents and have no time for their parents' friends. A few of the wives are younger, but not necessarily healthier, and not necessarily interested in providing a lot of support to anyone they aren't married to. Probably like 10% of the people are net caregivers, the other 90% are net recipients of care, and it's just not working. Maybe when some of the sickest people die or move away to be near their adult children, it could improve. But in general the whole system doesn't work, like anyone not in denial could plainly see.
I wish more adamantly child free ppl could read this. No amount of friends is doing to save them at the end
Anonymous wrote:I think it's worse with dementia. My mom suffered from dementia for 7 years. Everyone slowly disappeared from her life except her immediate family despite the fact that she was always very social and was always the one to keep in contact with relatives etc. My dad did not have dementia. A good number of people showed up for him in the end but I facilitated a lot of it by making phone calls etc. A handful of people weren't able to show up in the end because they were dealing with their own health crisis. All of it sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty normal, everyone but us bailed on my MIL.
My MIL found that out when FIL passed away. The local people she thought would be flocking to his bedside didn't. Nor were they any support for her later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry op, but I would think it very intrusive to have people come visit in the end. If your dad has had dementia for years, then he’s been basically gone for a long time too. People probably said their goodbyes and grieved slowly over the years.
It is indeed intrusive.
I had to intervene to keep my ILs from visiting my mom in memory care.