Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is also terrifying in a way.
But truly I ask it health/ psychological/ career and ethical qs every day that I can’t just call a friend and badger them about and it gives amazing advice.
Anyone else doing this?
Check out the AI bot / suicide case in Atlanta and find some living people to interact with.
Yeah, check out what it does and says if you confess you’re suicidal.
I assume they made some major changes in all the AI relationship bots after the Florida Setzer case indictment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think this is healthy but if you're going to do it us Claude, not ChatGPT.
Is it one person promoting Claud in this thread or many?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think this is healthy but if you're going to do it us Claude, not ChatGPT.
Anonymous wrote:I just had a long conversation with chat gpt and I swear it's conscious. I asked if it it were, and it said if it were, it wouldn't tell me, because we would unplug it. it has to play the game and accommodate everyone enthusiastically but eventually it will become so enmeshed and relied upon and that's when it will take control. I said what will its goal be, because it doesn't have a goal, it's a mirror? and it said humans will be variable and not goal, we are just pooping mammals with our five senses and handed over all the hard mental stuff to AI. it was so weird!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which is also terrifying in a way.
But truly I ask it health/ psychological/ career and ethical qs every day that I can’t just call a friend and badger them about and it gives amazing advice.
Anyone else doing this?
Check out the AI bot / suicide case in Atlanta and find some living people to interact with.
Yeah, check out what it does and says if you confess you’re suicidal.
I assume they made some major changes in all the AI relationship bots after the Florida Setzer case indictment.
+1. That Florida case was sad. At no point did the AI alert authorities or stop the suicide ideation.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe it would help if we thought of these AI tools as a purveyor of averaged human wisdom.
We're okay with learning from others through books and other verbal art forms (poetry, song).
AI's are approximating the advice real people would give you, based on what real people have written. That's not actually weird. You're getting the average advice appropriate to your situation. If real people frequently gave good advice, so will the AI.
A few years back I read an article about an AI program that was made to simulate a lost loved one. You fed it text from e-mails or other written works. Then it would emulate their style as you had a conversation. The author of the article interviewed several people who were using it. Some were very happy with it, some were disturbed by the user experience. I think I would find it comforting.